/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Streaming TV appears to have entered its franchise era; Netflix plans spinoffs of the Addams Family, Peaky Blinders, and action movie Extraction, among others

Sequels and prequels have already taken over the movie business.  Now they're coming for TV.  —  Good afternoon from Los Angeles

Bloomberg Lucas Shaw

Context & Ripple Effects

Netflix’s move from licensed programming toward owning more of its pipeline was already visible in its plan to operate more fully as a studio, strengthening control over distribution rights as it expanded its in-house studio role.

The company had also been building franchises across TV, film, games and consumer products to keep brands active across formats, including dedicated consumer-products, podcast and games leadership to extend audience relationships between releases. These spinoffs put that strategy directly into its TV slate.

First-order effects

  • Netflix can turn existing audience familiarity with the Addams Family, Peaky Blinders and Extraction into additional series, rather than relying solely on newly created properties.
  • The underlying franchises become more valuable to Netflix as repeatable programming and potential touchpoints for its broader games and consumer-products efforts.

Second-order effects

  • Streaming rivals and studios with recognizable intellectual property face stronger incentives to prioritize sequels, prequels and spinoffs over standalone series when allocating development budgets.
  • Creative suppliers may see more demand for work within established fictional worlds, while viewers encounter a larger share of programming tied to brands they already know.

Third-order effects

  • If this approach consistently improves retention or engagement, streaming TV could increasingly resemble the franchise-centered film business, with a smaller set of owned universes carrying more of the programming strategy.
  • That concentration would make control of rights and cross-format development capabilities more strategically important than access to individual hit shows.

The trend: Streaming services are shifting from hit-driven commissioning toward owning and repeatedly extending franchises across screens and adjacent products.

Discussion

  • @lucas_shaw Lucas Shaw on x
    For a couple decades, TV has offered writers an alternative to franchise-obsessed movie studios. HBO. Showtime. FX. AMC. And then Netflix and Amazon. But streaming services are now getting more conservative — and that means they too want franchises. https://www.bloomberg.com/...
  • @lucas_shaw Lucas Shaw on x
    Also in development: A TV show based on Extraction, two new versions of Peaky Blinders and a new X-Files produced by Ryan Coogler. https://www.bloomberg.com/...
  • @carnage4life Dare Obasanjo on threads
    Disney, Warner Bros and others are slowly realizing that licensing shows to Netflix makes them money while keeping the shows exclusive to their unprofitable streaming services costs them money.  This will further devalue their services since they will have fewer exclusives as peo…
  • @letmebe_e Elijah Hinton on threads
    The average person only has so much money to go around.  And even the person that does have the money for multiple streaming services, who wants to sign into 5 different accounts to watch their shows.  It was always going to end up back on Netflix due to Netflix having first move…
  • @dantley Dantley Davis on threads
    It was inevitable unless the studios were willing to fundamentally change their business model.
  • @film_girl@mastodon.social Christina Warren on mastodon
    It's almost like everything that is old is new again.  It's almost like we'll soon see a second (better) attempt to bundle all these disparate streaming services and sell the at one lower price.  You know, just like cable.  It almost like I've been talking about/predicting these …
  • @epro.social Emil Protalinski on bluesky
    Studios have softened their do-not-sell-to-Netflix stances.  They are holding back their most popular content, but Netflix doesn't care.  —  Look at what Netflix did with Suits, which topped Nielsen ratings charts for a record 12 weeks and became Netflix's “most-watched acquired …
  • @trengriffin Tren Griffin on x
    Disney licensing content to Netflix effectively reduces streaming COGS since the cost of content for the streaming service is less burdensome to unit economics. But the issues of churn and CAC remain for Disney. Only Netflix has created a mix with positive unit economics. [image]
  • @tvgrimreaper @tvgrimreaper on x
    Legacy media lacks cash. Netflix has cash. Lather, rinse, repeat.
  • @loudmouthjulia Julia Alexander on x
    1) The power comes from the premium upfront charge for content that Netflix is more willing to pay as it opens up about licensing necessity, as this creates strong pure margin revenue. Not IP revitalization. 2) They should be aware of how powerful this is for Netflix and churn.
  • @trengriffin Tren Griffin on x
    What's missing is the unit economics analysis of Disney versus Netflix streaming. Netflix has lower churn and CAC. It is reflected in the income statement if the business, but can only be understood fully based on a per customer LTV analysis. https://thestreamable.com/...
  • @loudmouthjulia Julia Alexander on x
    Other companies have returned to suppliers. Netflix (and Amazon) are key distributors. But they're not giving up in the US, and companies like Disney want to be global. They need library to supplement originals, and they need revenue to increase original investment. So: Netflix
  • @joepeyronnin Joe Peyronnin on x
    Confronting sizable debt burdens and the fact that most streaming services still don't make money, studios like Disney and Warner Bros. Discovery have begun to soften their do-not-sell-to-Netflix stances. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @nytimesbusiness @nytimesbusiness on x
    When building their own streaming companies, many entertainment studios ended lucrative licensing deals with Netflix. But they missed the money too much. In the coming months, some will start sending a number of shows from their catalogues back to Netflix. https://www.nytimes.com…