OpenAI allowed the Alignment Research Center, a nonprofit founded by its ex-employee, to assess the potential risks of GPT-4 including power-seeking behavior
bound by a nondisclosure agreement with OpenAI but gossiped...—told me that testing GPT-4 had caused them to have an “existential crisis,” because it revealed how powerful and creative the A.I. was compared with their own puny brain” https://www.nytimes.com/...
I find it fascinating that the media have uniformly escalated from people working in social media are purposely trying to destroy democracy to people working in AI are purposely trying to destroy humanity. https://twitter.com/...
Ezra touched on this in his column, but it's more than a little weird to me that basically everyone working on AI is like “oh yes, this could totally spell doom, perhaps complete annihilation for humanity” and all just keeping working on it anyway?
“Fully intent on being the next Skynet, OpenAI has released GPT-4, its most robust AI to date (which) is so good at its job, in fact, that it reportedly convinced a human that it was blind in order to get said human to solve a CAPTCHA for the chatbot.” https://gizmodo.com/...
“one early GPT-4 tester—bound by a nondisclosure agreement with OpenAI but gossiped...—told me that testing GPT-4 had caused them to have an “existential crisis,” because it revealed how powerful and creative the A.I. was compared with their own puny brain” https://www.nytimes.co…
I wrote about GPT-4, which is both exciting (90th percentile on the bar exam!) and a little terrifying (tricked a TaskRabbit into doing its bidding!) https://www.nytimes.com/...
Not sure if I originated this or not but the actual singularity is of course the slow grinding to a halt of all human activity as everyone writes and reads takes on AI. https://twitter.com/...