/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Square lost $56M+ in Starbucks deal over three years, partnership to end in Q3 2016

Square's deal with Starbucks is a bust, and will end in Q3 next year  —  In 2012, Square formed a partnership with Starbucks that ranked among the biggest of the payments company's history.

VentureBeat Ken Yeung

Context & Ripple Effects

The Starbucks partnership was Square's marquee brand win of 2012, but the arc has been running downhill since late 2014, when Starbucks said it would not adopt Square Order once Square Wallet was retired — leaving Square without a consumer product for its biggest retail counter. The $56M+ loss figure lands the same day as Square's NYSE IPO filing on $560.6M first-half revenue and a $77.6M half-year loss, so the disclosure reads as pre-IPO housecleaning: pricing a money-losing anchor deal out before public-market scrutiny.

First-order effects

  • Square exits Q3 2016 without its highest-profile merchant, removing both the Starbucks payment volume and the halo that anchored its pitch to other retailers during the IPO roadshow.
  • The disclosed per-deal economics give IPO investors their first hard look at what logo partnerships actually cost, right as Square argues it can narrow the $77.6M half-year loss.

Second-order effects

  • Square's post-Starbucks distribution push shifts toward software partners where it controls pricing — the TouchBistro and Vend integrations extend payments and Square Capital to their installed bases instead of subsidizing one giant counter.
  • Competing mobile-payments players courting national chains now face sellers who know Square paid over $56M for the privilege, tightening terms across large-format deals.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, big-brand payments partnerships get judged on unit economics rather than press value, pushing smaller processors toward embedded distribution through POS software vendors instead of subsidized flagship accounts — a quasi-exit from loss-leader scale deals.

The trend: Payments companies are trading vanity anchor-tenant deals for unit-economics-positive embedded distribution through vertical software platforms.