/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Study: among 71 top VC firms, 92% of individuals on senior investment teams are male, 78% are white, 1.3% are Hispanic, and less than 1% are black

Peter Schulz / The Information :

The Information Peter Schulz

Context & Ripple Effects

This study extends a scorekeeping run that started earlier in 2015, when Fortune counted just 5.6% of senior partners and 10% of investment professionals at 191 US VC firms as women. The Information's addition is granularity on race: across 71 top firms, Hispanic investors sit at 1.3% and Black investors below 1%, making this the clearest ethnic breakdown of senior VC teams in the coverage so far.

What makes the number matter is what follows it: Richard Kerby's review of ~1,500 VCs three years later, Axios finding women control just 4.7% of venture dollars raised over five years, and UK data showing senior female representation flat between 2017 and 2019. The measurement keeps repeating; the composition barely moves.

First-order effects

  • The 71 surveyed firms now have a published benchmark they can be measured against by limited partners, press, and job candidates — and with fewer than 1% Black and 1.3% Hispanic senior investors, any firm claiming a diversity effort starts from near-zero representation at the decision-making level.
  • Black and Hispanic professionals in adjacent finance roles see the actual size of the hiring pool: effectively single-digit people across the top of the industry.

Second-order effects

  • Limited partners gain a standardized diligence question — firm-level demographics become part of fund diligence alongside returns, forcing GPs to report composition whether or not they plan to change it.
  • Diverse-led emerging managers acquire a fundraising pitch against incumbents' documented homogeneity, while founders outside investor networks face gatekeepers who, per the related coverage, share schools and backgrounds — Kerby found about 40% attended Stanford or Harvard.

Third-order effects

  • If team composition holds steady while measurement continues, capital allocation locks into the same profile: the Crunchbase founder data showing 77.1% white and 1% black VC-backed founders mirrors the investor side, suggesting network-driven deal flow reproduces both numbers simultaneously.
  • The likely structural endpoint is external pressure substituting for internal change — LP mandates, disclosure requirements, or new fund formation doing the work that five years of headcount studies did not.

The trend: Venture capital has entered an era of recurring demographic audit — successive studies through 2019 show senior teams barely changing, shifting the debate from measuring the problem to who forces the industry to act on it.