/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

In test of six sets of identical twins, none fool Windows Hello face recognition feature

Windows Hello: can identical twins fool Microsoft and Intel?  —  CAN TWINS TRICK FACIAL RECOGNITION?  —  Windows 10 paired with Intel's RealSense camera gives users a new way to log in to their computers- facial recognition.

TheAustralian Chris Griffith

Context & Ripple Effects

When Windows 10 shipped with Intel's RealSense camera, the obvious stress test was the hardest one in biology: six sets of identical twins, none of whom could trick the Windows Hello login. The pass mattered because rival approaches were about to look fragile by comparison.

The surrounding coverage frames this as round one of an escalating spoofing contest: researchers later fooled many AI systems with printed paper eyeglass frames, Samsung's Galaxy S8 face unlock fell to a plain photograph, and by 2019 attackers were using 3D masks against Alipay, WeChat Pay, and airport gates.

First-order effects

  • Microsoft and Intel get third-party validation that RealSense's depth-based capture resists the closest possible lookalikes, strengthening Hello's pitch as a password replacement at Windows 10 launch.
  • Samsung's photo-vulnerable face unlock stands in contrast: the twin result hands depth-sensing vendors a security talking point over RGB-camera-only implementations.

Second-order effects

  • Device makers shipping face recognition are pushed toward depth cameras or layered biometrics — Samsung itself steered S8 users toward fingerprint and iris scanning after its photo incident.
  • Payment and transit operators relying on facial verification, later hit by 3D mask attacks on Alipay and WeChat Pay, have grounds to demand hardware-level anti-spoofing rather than software-only checks.

Third-order effects

  • If the attack curve holds — photos, then glasses, then masks, then nine computer-generated "master key" faces impersonating nearly half a benchmark set — biometric authentication becomes an arms race where liveness detection is table stakes and no single modality is trusted alone.

The trend: Consumer facial recognition is splitting into two tiers — depth-hardware systems that survive physical impersonation attempts and cheap camera implementations that keep falling to ever-cheaper spoofs.