/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Verizon: That peering flap (about Netflix) is Cogent's fault

Earlier this week we reported that a peering flap between Verizon and Cogent Communications was the reason some folks were having sub-optimal experience when trying to get access to Netflix content.

GigaOM Om Malik

Context & Ripple Effects

The dispute follows reports of Netflix access problems tied to Verizon two days earlier. Verizon's public response reframes the issue from an ISP-side customer experience problem into a disagreement with Cogent over the interconnection path carrying Netflix traffic.

The stakes are unusually high because Netflix accounted for nearly one-third of internet traffic entering North American homes in May 2013. That volume makes a peering dispute between Verizon and Cogent consequential for Netflix viewers even though neither company directly controls Netflix's programming.

First-order effects

  • Verizon places responsibility for the suboptimal Netflix experience on Cogent, putting Cogent under pressure to contest or resolve the peering claim.
  • Netflix subscribers whose traffic traverses the Verizon-Cogent connection remain exposed to poorer streaming performance while the carriers dispute the route.

Second-order effects

  • Netflix's scale turns interconnection capacity into a visible part of its customer experience, giving Verizon, Cogent and Netflix stronger incentives to address delivery arrangements rather than treat them as back-end plumbing.
  • The public attribution fight shifts scrutiny toward each carrier's peering practices, rather than leaving Netflix alone to answer for streaming quality.

Third-order effects

  • If high-volume video services repeatedly surface in carrier peering disputes, broadband competition will increasingly be judged by interconnection performance as well as last-mile access.
  • The episode points toward a delivery market in which the terms for moving major content traffic become a strategic bargaining point between access networks and transit providers.

The trend: Streaming video’s growing share of household traffic is making once-obscure peering arrangements a public battleground over service quality and network bargaining power.