/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

GE teams up with AT&T and Intel to conquer the industrial internet.  Here's its plan.

Two years ago GE made some big bets on the internet of things — what it calls the industrial internet.  It opened an office in San Ramone, Calif. and started articulating a vision of connected sensors sending data …

GigaOM Stacey Higginbotham

Context & Ripple Effects

This is GE's industrial internet strategy moving from vision to infrastructure. The company opened its San Ramon office two years earlier to chase connected sensors and machine data; today's confirmed partnerships with AT&T and Intel attach a carrier and a chipmaker to that plan, giving GE connectivity and silicon rather than just rhetoric. The story travelled widely on pickup day — NYT Bits, AllThingsD, ZDNet and SiliconANGLE all carried it, a signal of how much attention an industrial conglomerate courting the tech press could command in 2013.

The pieces are complementary: AT&T brings network reach for moving machine data (its consumer Rest of World pricing — $30 per 120MB — shows how far from flat-rate industrial-scale connectivity still is), while Intel's recently shipped low-power Haswell parts, drawing as little as 4.5 watts, are positioned for embedded sensing and gateway hardware rather than just PCs.

First-order effects

  • AT&T gains a marquee machine-to-machine customer beyond smartphones, extending its network business into industrial contracts where per-device data volumes, not voice minutes, drive revenue.
  • Intel secures a design path for its power-efficient Haswell-class silicon inside sensors, controllers and gateways — a market outside the PC franchise it has depended on.

Second-order effects

  • Rival carriers face pressure to land their own industrial-equipment partners, because whoever holds the connectivity contract for GE's turbines and locomotives sets the template for other manufacturers' fleets.
  • Other industrial giants must decide whether to build equivalent software-and-sensor stacks themselves or partner — GE's move makes 'we sell you machines plus data services' a competitive answer competitors have to match.

Third-order effects

  • If heavy-equipment makers succeed at monetizing sensor data, the industry shifts from selling machines outright toward selling uptime and efficiency — with control of the software layer becoming as valuable as the hardware itself.
  • The carrier-chipmaker-industrial triangle points toward connectivity and embedded compute being priced as commodities, with value concentrating in whoever owns the analytics platform above them.

The trend: Industrial manufacturers are repositioning as software-and-data companies by renting connectivity and silicon from carriers and chipmakers, turning installed machinery into subscription revenue.