/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Microsoft adds two more Android tablet makers to its patent-licensing list

Summary: Add Aluratek and Colby Electronics to the list of Android and Chrome OS tablet/PC makers who are paying MIcrosoft patent royalties.  —  Follow @maryjofoley  —  Microsoft has added yet two more companies …

ZDNet Mary Jo Foley

Context & Ripple Effects

Microsoft has been methodically collecting Android and Chrome OS licensees since at least September 2011, when it was already being framed as Android's patent toll collector. The run continued through ODM deals with Quanta and its tenth agreement, with Compal Electronics, and today adds two smaller consumer brands — Aluratek and Colby Electronics — to the royalty-paying roster.

The story travelled unusually wide for a two-name announcement, picked up by AllThingsD, the Seattle Times, MobileSyrup and others on the same day, which says less about these particular companies than about how closely the trade watches each new signature on Microsoft's list.

First-order effects

  • Aluratek and Colby Electronics now owe Microsoft a per-device royalty on their Android and Chrome OS tablets and PCs, adding a direct cost line to hardware that runs a nominally free operating system.
  • Microsoft gains two more public proof points that its Android patent portfolio is enforceable enough that even small vendors sign rather than litigate.

Second-order effects

  • Every new signature raises the pressure on the remaining unlicensed Android makers, who face the choice of paying up, fighting in court, or shifting volume toward platforms without that royalty overhang — a calculus sharpened by Windows RT's October debut.
  • For Google, each deal chips at Android's core pitch to OEMs of zero licensing cost, making the platform economics conversation with hardware partners harder.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, patent royalties become a structural feature of the Android ecosystem rather than an exception — effectively a private tax administered through bilateral deals that shapes which devices get built and at what margin.
  • The accumulating licensee list also builds Microsoft's leverage for future negotiations across mobile and Chrome OS, turning an IP portfolio into a recurring revenue business independent of Windows sales.

The trend: Microsoft is converting Android's open-source, zero-royalty model into a per-device licensing stream one signed OEM at a time.