/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Forrester: No Android Tablet Has More Than 5% Share vs iPad.  How Does Amazon's Kindle Fire Compare?

On the eve of what may well be the launch of a brand new iPad from Apple comes some new analysis from Forrester Research on the current competitive landscape in tablets — or lack thereof, as the case seems to be.

TechCrunch Ingrid Lunden

Context & Ripple Effects

The Kindle Fire arrived in late 2011 amid inflated expectations: an October report cited leaked sales numbers suggesting it was on track to outsell the iPad, while a November survey found 65% of prospective tablet buyers still wanted an iPad against 22% for the Fire (Electronista's buyer-preference study) — two signals pointing in opposite directions.

Forrester's March 6, 2012 analysis lands on the side of the preference data: no Android tablet, Fire included, clears 5% share against the iPad. Coming on the eve of an unconfirmed but widely expected new iPad launch, it reframes the Fire less as an iPad killer than as the leading member of a fragmented also-ran field — which is why Bloomberg, PC Magazine, PC World and DigiTimes all picked it up the same day.

First-order effects

  • Amazon's Fire is repositioned by the numbers from iPad rival to largest slice of a sub-5% Android cohort, putting pressure on the 'Fire is outselling the iPad' narrative from the fall's leaked figures.

Second-order effects

  • Android tablet makers outside Amazon face a squeeze: with none holding meaningful share, they must either match the Fire's subsidized price point or concede the low end, while Apple's imminent refresh threatens to widen the gap at the top.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, the tablet market consolidates into one dominant integrated vendor plus discount hardware attached to retail ecosystems — making unit-share metrics less useful than ecosystem and content attach rates for judging who is actually winning.

The trend: Tablets are bifurcating into a single dominant premium platform and price-subsidized challengers, with analyst share measurements increasingly arbitrating which challenger narratives survive.