/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Study: 65% of tablet buyers want an iPad, 22% a Kindle Fire

ChangeWave says Kindle Fire 1st non-iPad to matter  —  Amazon's Kindle Fire is the first tablet outside of the iPad to get any meaningful demand, ChangeWave said in a new study.  Although Apple was still by far the dominant pick …

Electronista

Context & Ripple Effects

The October early signs that the Kindle Fire might do well have hardened into numbers: a ChangeWave study puts intended demand for Amazon's $199 tablet at 22% of prospective buyers, against 65% who want an iPad. That makes the Fire the first non-Apple tablet to register meaningful purchase intent at all — every other Android entrant has polled in the noise.

The timing matters because the Fire had only just been announced when sentiment was being measured, and a separate DigiTimes report — unconfirmed supply-chain sourcing — claims Amazon is already planning an 8.9-inch follow-up to the 7-inch Fire for late Q2 2012. If demand intent this strong holds through the holiday quarter, Amazon's content-and-commerce pricing model rather than hardware specs is what's pulling buyers.

First-order effects

  • Amazon enters the holiday season with demonstrated buyer demand behind its $199 price point, validating the sell-hardware-near-cost, monetize-content strategy over the margin-rich approach every other Android vendor took.
  • Apple retains a dominant two-thirds share of stated demand, so the Fire's gains come at the expense of the rest of the Android tablet field rather than the iPad itself.

Second-order effects

  • Samsung, Motorola and other Android tablet makers are squeezed from both ends — undercut by a $199 rival with Amazon's retail and media muscle above them, and outclassed by the iPad below them — forcing them toward price cuts or exit.
  • If the rumored 8.9-inch Fire materializes, Amazon would be attacking the iPad's screen-size tier directly while keeping its cost advantage, pressuring Apple to defend the low end of its lineup.

Third-order effects

  • The tablet market is bifurcating into two viable models — a premium integrated ecosystem (Apple) and a subsidized content-delivery device (Amazon) — with generic mid-priced Android tablets holding neither position.
  • Demand measurement firms like ChangeWave become the de facto scoreboard for whether second-mover platforms can carve out real share, shaping where developers and media partners commit next.

The trend: Tablet demand is consolidating around two poles — Apple's premium ecosystem and Amazon's price-led content play — leaving conventional Android tablets without a defensible middle.