/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Goldman: Microsoft Is Getting $444 Million Annually From Android Patent Licenses

Microsoft is will generate $444 million in revenue from Android patent deals for fiscal year 2012 (started in July 1, 2011, ends June 30, 2012), according to a note from Goldman Sachs's tech analyst team.

Business Insider Jay Yarow

Context & Ripple Effects

The Goldman figure lands one day after Microsoft's broad cross-licensing deal with Samsung, the largest Android-related patent agreement to date, which put a per-device royalty on every handset Samsung sells. It turns what looked like scattered bilateral settlements into a measurable revenue line.

The estimate also sharpens an awkward comparison first flagged by asymco in May 2011: Microsoft had already earned five times more income from Android than from Windows Phone. With Samsung signed, analysts are treating the licensing program — which one blog called Microsoft cementing its role as Android's patent toll collector — as a core part of the mobile P&L rather than legal housekeeping.

First-order effects

  • Microsoft gains a recurring, high-margin revenue stream on rival hardware: Goldman pegs it at $444 million for fiscal 2012, with the Samsung agreement alone attaching royalties to the largest Android vendor's entire device volume.
  • Every remaining unlicensed Android manufacturer now faces a demonstrated template — settle with Microsoft or risk litigation — since the biggest OEM has already agreed to pay.

Second-order effects

  • Licensing costs raise Android's effective price for OEMs, narrowing the gap against Windows Phone at exactly the moment Microsoft needs leverage to attract handset makers and developers to its still-small Marketplace.
  • Royalty income effectively subsidizes Microsoft's mobile platform push: money collected from Android devices can fund Windows Phone marketing and subsidies without showing up as platform losses.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, 'free' open-source mobile platforms acquire a de facto patent rent paid to incumbents, making litigation-and-licensing a standard second revenue channel for any company holding foundational smartphone IP.
  • OEM economics shift toward vendors with deep cross-licensing portfolios, pressuring smaller Android manufacturers who lack the patent stock to negotiate symmetric deals.

The trend: Smartphone patents are becoming a parallel profit center, letting incumbent platforms monetize rivals' hardware success through royalties rather than device sales.