/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Why no iPhone SDK?

Scoble says Steve Jobs isn't an idiot, he knows that developers make a big difference in the success of a platform.  He concludes that an SDK, turning the iPhone into an open platform, will come at some point after the initial release, maybe as early as January 2008.

Scripting News Dave Winer

Context & Ripple Effects

The iPhone ships in under two weeks as a closed device — no SDK has been released — and the question hanging over Apple's developer relations right now is whether that was deliberate. At Monday's WWDC keynote in San Francisco, Jobs pointed developers at Safari 3's speed as the answer, and reactions were divided between the inspired and the disappointed.

Robert Scoble's argument here is that Jobs understands developer ecosystems make or break platforms, so the closed launch is staging rather than strategy-by-omission — an SDK arriving after the initial release, possibly as early as January 2008. It's a bet about sequencing: lock the hardware experience down first, open the platform second.

First-order effects

  • Developers targeting the iPhone have exactly one sanctioned path at launch — web apps through Safari — while native tooling stays off-limits.
  • Rival smartphone platforms get their clearest recruiting pitch yet: openness versus a closed device whose developer story is a promise, not a product.

Second-order effects

  • If an SDK does arrive on Scoble's timeline, every term of it — approval process, restrictions, revenue split — becomes Apple's unilateral call, set after developers have already invested in the platform.
  • Competing handset makers can be expected to counter-position around native development freedom, turning Apple's staged opening into a wedge for developer mindshare.

Third-order effects

  • The episode crystallizes a governance question that outlasts this launch cycle: who decides when and how a platform opens, and what leverage does the vendor hold by controlling the timing — the platform-nimbleness trade-off Apple is visibly weighing.
  • If Scoble's read holds, 'ship closed, open later' becomes a repeatable playbook for consumer hardware launches, with developer patience as the resource being spent.

The trend: Smartphone competition is shifting from hardware specs to developer ecosystems, with the platform owner's control over when and how to open the API emerging as the decisive strategic lever.