The US Commerce Department removed details from its website about its May 5 agreement with Google, xAI, and Microsoft to test their AI models for security flaws
The U.S. Commerce Department removed details from its website about its agreement with Google, xAI and Microsoft to test their artificial intelligence models …
Reuters Courtney Rozen
Related Coverage
- The Government's Page About Its AI Vetting Deals with Google, xAI, and Microsoft Is Missing from Its Website Gizmodo · Mike Pearl
- Trump invites tech CEOs on China trip Associated Press
- The US Commerce Department deletes website details of Microsoft, Google, and xAI security-test deal The Next Web · Alina Maria Stan
- Letter: There's a likely reason Trump wants to safety check AI models Salt Lake Tribune · Frank T. Globokar
- Sources: the White House's Office of the National Cyber Director and Commerce Department's CAISI are fighting over which agency should lead AI model evaluations Washington Post
Discussion
-
@cat_zakrzewski
Cat Zakrzewski
on x
The website was removed because of sensitivities within the White House Office of the National Cyber Director, amid an administration turf war over AI evaluations https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ...
-
@ryanaclarke
Ryan Clarke
on x
there was *no* announcement [image]
-
@shakeelhashim
Shakeel
on x
This is very odd
-
@peterwildeford
Peter Wildeford
on x
I think it's unironically cool that different parts of the White House are fighting each other over who can best manage AI risks
-
@justinbullock14
Justin Bullock
on x
Maybe we just can't have nice things.🤷🏻♂️🤨
-
@ashleyrgold
Ashley Gold
on x
That @NIST CAISI announcement from last week about Google DeepMind, xAI and Microsoft signing new deals for pre-deployment testing is gone from their website, link no longer found, and I can't get anyone from Commerce to tell me why. See for yourself: https://www.nist.gov/...
-
NewsMax.com
Jim Mishler
on x
Report: Trump Admin Divided on AI Regulation
-
@miles_brundage
Miles Brundage
on x
Worrying zero-sum mindsets here, if this coverage is accurate. It's pretty obvious both CAISI and the intelligence community have important but different roles to play https://x.com/...
-
@chrisrmcguire
Chris McGuire
on x
Thanks to @Cat_Zakrzewski, @nakashimae, and @nitashatiku for including my thoughts in their piece in @washingtonpost on how the administration is reevaluating its approach to AI policy in light of recent capability developments. [image]
-
@neil_chilson
Neil Chilson
on x
The Washington Post is reporting that the U.S. intelligence community is interested in a much more prominent role in reviewing AI models. The intelligence community has a complicated history with powerful new technologies. This is the community that in the 1990s opposed strong
-
@neilturkewitz
Neil Turkewitz
on x
@Cat_Zakrzewski ... “Biden established the US AI Safety Institute under the Commerce [Department]... In a sign of the new administration's shift, Trump removed “Safety” from the agency's name & rebranded it as the “Center for AI Standards & Innovation.” A rose by any other name, …
-
@gerritd
Gerrit De Vynck
on x
for those wondering why @NIST mysteriously took down its model testing announcement last Friday
-
@cat_zakrzewski
Cat Zakrzewski
on x
NEW: The Trump administration is sharply split over a proposal to give spy agencies a bigger role in evaluating AI models. One person described it as a ‘knife fight.’ w/ @nakashimae @nitashatiku https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ...
-
@justinbullock14
Justin Bullock
on x
The pressure on the tech right is.... accelerating...