/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

The jury in Los Angeles' social media trial awards the plaintiff $3M in compensatory damages and $3M in punitive damages; Meta will pay 70% and YouTube 30%

New York Times:NEW

New York Times

Discussion

  • r/politics r on reddit
    Meta and YouTube Found Negligent in Landmark Social Media Addiction Case
  • @meghanncuniff Meghann Cuniff on x
    The trial is NOT OVER. The jury said YouTube and Meta acted with malice and fraud, so now they have to decide the amount of punitive damages on top of the $3 million in compensatory. Court is back in session at 11 a.m. PST.
  • @meghanncuniff Meghann Cuniff on x
    During juror polling, two of the 12 jurors said this isn't their verdict. Civil juries in California state court do not have to be unanimous.
  • @meghanncuniff Meghann Cuniff on x
    The jury returned the same verdict for YouTube. Yes to all questions. KGM's compensatory damages are $3 million. Meta gets 70% of the blame, YouTube 30%. Jurors said YES to malice and fraud,
  • @caseynewton Casey Newton on bluesky
    This verdict seemed very likely the moment that TikTok and Snap settled rather than go to trial.  A landmark moment for Big Tech www.nytimes.com/2026/03/25/t...
  • @jamespmcleod.ca James McLeod on bluesky
    This is a big deal; Canada should take notice.  —  Meta and YouTube Found Negligent in Landmark Social Media Addiction Case  —  Jury found them negligent in app designs, harming a young user with design features that were addictive and led to her mental health distress.  —  www.n…
  • r/PoliticalOptimism r on reddit
    Meta and YouTube Found Negligent in Landmark Social Media Addiction Case
  • r/Lawyertalk r on reddit
    Meta and YouTube Found Negligent in Landmark Social Media Addiction Case
  • r/neoliberal r on reddit
    Meta, YouTube found negligent in landmark social media addiction trial
  • @bobbyallyn Bobby Allyn on x
    One of the jurors, who gave her name as Victoria, addressed reporters in the courtroom hallway after the verdict standing next to the jury foreman, Matthew. Victoria said: “we wanted them to feel it, we wanted them to know this was unacceptable.”
  • @klonick Kate Klonick on bluesky
    It is really early to tell the significance of this bc it could all be reversed on appeal on both whether the judge's early 1A and 230 decisions were correct (which allowed this to proceed to trial) and then the jury's decision as well.  —  This will likely be years before it is …
  • @klonick Kate Klonick on bluesky
    Jury just came back with an additional $3M in punitive damages so grand total of $6M.  —  ~2000 Plaintiffs consolidated on the case are in different situations but even as a bottom number for settlement that puts the loss around $12B just for the California state cases that are c…
  • @willoremus.com Will Oremus on bluesky
    Yesterday a jury in New Mexico found that Meta endangered children online.  Today a jury in California found Meta and YouTube negligent for addictive product design.  —  And now: “There are thousands more lawsuits waiting to be heard... ” www.washingtonpost.com/technology/ 2...
  • r/technology r on reddit
    Meta and YouTube designed addictive products that harmed young people, jury finds
  • @meghanncuniff Meghann Cuniff on x
    The two jurors who disagreed with every answer (both are women) did not speak to reporters, but their tones during polling indicated they REALLY disagree. After 8 days of deliberation, the defense teams will have a lot to dig through as they prepare their motions for new trial.
  • @meghanncuniff Meghann Cuniff on x
    “He's the guru, so to speak, and he should have really, really known what he was going to say out to us jurors, before he even said anything,” the juror said of Zuckerberg.
  • @meghanncuniff Meghann Cuniff on x
    Two jurors spoke to reporters in the courthouse hallway about their $6 million verdict against Meta and YouTube. ($3M compensatory | $3M punitive, 70% Meta | 30% YouTube) One said Mark Zuckerberg's testimony “was not, it was — he changed it, and that didn't sit well with us.”
  • @bedoyausa Alvaro Bedoya on x
    Jurors have now recommended an additional $3 million in punitive damages, for a tentative total of $6M to K.G.M., the plaintiff. Every single AI company running parasocial chatbots is going to be holding some long meetings over the next few days.
  • @richardhanania Richard Hanania on x
    Woman gets $3 million in a jury trial because she says YouTube and Meta made her mentally ill. I'm concerned about kids and social media. But the hostility to personal responsibility and lawlessness of this decision is much worse. https://www.wsj.com/...