Discussion

• @sriramk Sriram Krishnan on x

  Our national framework for AI 👇

• @andrewcurran_ Andrew Curran on x

  From the Intellectual Property Rights section of the new National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence: 'Although the Administration believes that training of Al models on copyrighted material does not violate copyright laws, it acknowledges arguments to the contrary [ima…

• @natpurser Nat Purser on x

  my first thought after reading the admin's national AI framework is that this will mostly incentivize some ... strategically ambiguous state legislation. anchoring everything in existing statutory authority, using tech-neutral language, focusing on deployment, etc.

• @deanwball Dean W. Ball on x

  The White House's proposal for a nationwide AI law is a thoughtful document that will serve as an excellent foundation for the legislative work ahead. I would be happy to see these principles, if translated well into statute, become law. Congratulations to those involved! [image]

• @nathanleamerdc Nathan Leamer on x

  This proposal from the White House is a template for success. AI policy is the catalyst to solve for the future. Safeguarding the most vulnerable while also enabling unparalleled economic opportunity and prosperity across the US. For too long we have seen inaction on so many

• @ednewtonrex Ed Newton-Rex on x

  Very confused messaging on AI and copyright from the U.S. administration today. Kratsios says Congress should allow AI to train on copyrighted materials. But the National AI Policy Framework he is announcing says something different - it says Congress should let the question [ima…

• @davidsacks David Sacks on x

  In December, President Trump signed an Executive Order tasking us with the development of a national framework for AI, what he called “One Rulebook.” This was in response to a growing patchwork of 50 different state regulatory regimes that threaten to stifle innovation and

• @mkratsios47 Director Michael Kratsios on x

  Read the National AI Policy Framework here👇 https://www.whitehouse.gov/...

• @mkratsios47 Director Michael Kratsios on x

  Here are the most pressing topics in AI policy the National Framework addresses: 1. Protecting Children and Empowering Parents: Many Americans are concerned about children interacting with AI. Congress should require age-assurance tools and ensure AI platforms give parents

• @mkratsios47 Director Michael Kratsios on x

  Today, the @WhiteHouse released a commonsense National AI Policy Framework that ensures every American benefits from AI. As @POTUS has said — we need one federal AI policy, not a 50 state patchwork. This gets us there. Eager to work with Congress on this important legislation. [i…

• @nathanleamerdc Nathan Leamer on x

  Great point, earlier this week a Senator released an AI proposal claiming to be the Trump AI National framework. Terrible infringement on his Name, Image, and Likeness. Stop the counterfeits!!! Excited to see President Trump release his real AI plan.

• @gtjr @gtjr on bluesky

  Well I'm sure the states rights conservatives and libertarians will push back hard on this.  —  Oh wait...those people are just pretending to have principles.  Never mind.

• @benbrodydc Ben Brody on x

  @bradrcarson @NathanLeamerDC A “crucial step” and the kickoff of bipartisan negotiations, say @SpeakerJohnson, @SteveScaliseGOP and chairs of @HouseCommerce, @JudiciaryGOP and @housescience [image]

• @jakesherman Jake Sherman on x

  Johnson and co on the White House AI framework. [image]

• @luizajarovsky Luiza Jarovsky, PhD on x

  🚨 BREAKING: The White House has FINALLY released a National Policy Framework for AI. What might a “U.S. AI Act” look like? What will likely be the main bottlenecks during legislative negotiations? I'll cover the topic in depth in my newsletter. Join 92,200+ subscribers below. [im…

• @turnerloesel Turner Loesel on x

  Thank god this was released at 8:30 AM instead of the album drop style timing of the past few AI proposals

• @collin_mccune Collin McCune on x

  Thank you @POTUS, @DavidSacks47, @mkratsios47, and the full WH team for your leadership in pushing a national AI framework forward. Like other major industries in the United States, AI needs strong oversight from the federal government to protect the American public and to

• @ryanfedasiuk Ryan Fedasiuk on x

  3/ Protecting ratepayers from subsidizing the AI industry's electric bills is both smart politics and smart policy — and complements the administration's essential (and broadly bipartisan) work to streamline energy permitting in this country. [image]

• @ryanfedasiuk Ryan Fedasiuk on x

  2/ Specifically: calling for on-site power generation at data centers and streamlining permitting is exactly right. As @JoinFAI and NAM illustrate, the U.S. cannot win the race for AI adoption if every new facility spends years in regulatory purgatory. https://www.thefai.org/...

• @ryanfedasiuk Ryan Fedasiuk on x

  The White House has released its most comprehensive vision yet for AI policy. Most proponents of a National AI Framework have focused on federal preemption of state laws — but the most significant provisions of this document deal with energy. 🧵 1/ https://www.whitehouse.gov/...

• @innovators @innovators on x

  AIN represents little tech, where AI innovation starts. We appreciate the push for a national AI framework because Startups can't navigate a patchwork of 50 different state regulations just to be able to write a line of code. There's an important opportunity here to get this

• @deanwball Dean W. Ball on x

  I was especially heartened by this section and heartily concur with the White House that Congress should act to prevent government coercion over the free speech rights of AI developers and users alike. [image]

• @adamthierer Adam Thierer on x

  new Trump Administration AI legislative framework is out. More analysis to come, but here are 3 crucial elements that caught my eye: ✅"Congress should not create any new federal rulemaking body to regulate AI, and should instead support development and deployment of

• @sachalouise Sacha Haworth on x

  “States should not be permitted to penalize AI developers for a third party's unlawful conduct involving their models.” there it is again. AI amnesty for Big Tech, direct from the White House [image]

• @neil_chilson Neil Chilson on x

  This is a very comprehensive approach that is the culmination what President Trump has been doing since he set foot in office to ensure US AI dominance and widespread benefits for Americans. Now it's time for Congress to act.

• @nathanleamerdc Nathan Leamer on x

  Exciting news this morning. The White House is poised to introduce a national policy framework for AI. In this exclusive for Fox News, @mkratsios47 and @DavidSacks explain how this approach will provide much needed regulatory certainty for entrepreneurs while also protecting [ima…

• @speakerjohnson Speaker Mike Johnson on x

  My joint statement with Leader @SteveScalise, @HouseCommerce Chairman @RepGuthrie, @JudiciaryGOP Chairman @Jim_Jordan, and @housescience Chairman @RepBrianBabin on committing to act on the artificial intelligence (AI) framework released today by the Trump Administration: AI has

• @davidsacks David Sacks on x

  I want to thank President Trump for the opportunity to work on this alongside OSTP Director Michael Kratsios, US CTO Ethan Klein, NEC Deputy Director Ryan Baasch, Senior AI Adviser Sriram Krishnan and many others on the White House team. It's an honor. @mkratsios47 @skrishnan47

• @rikiparikh Riki Parikh on x

  This framework asks Congress to preempt state AI laws, but it hasn't earned that. It offers nothing on independent safety testing, no serious ideas on how to address labor market disruption, and no accountability standard for when AI systems cause harm. Worse, it would create

• @berinszoka Berin Szóka on x

  The new White House AI legislative framework is confused about the First Amendment: Gov't can't “prevent[] AI systems from being used to silence or censor lawful political expression” because AI providers' have a First Amendment right to not to decide which questions to answer [i…

• @thezvi Zvi Mowshowitz on x

  This section was indeed excellent.

• @sentedcruz Senator Ted Cruz on x

  I have repeatedly said that under no circumstances can we let China win the AI race. The world would be at risk of a powerful tool being in the hands of an adversary that could be used for global surveillance and control. @POTUS is taking meaningful steps, including the

• @deanwball Dean W. Ball on x

  The major and crucial distinction between this document and an Executive Order or another report like the AI Action Plan is that this document is self-consciously the opening move in a long, multi-dimensional public negotiation over the legislation. You must read it that way!

• @miles_brundage Miles Brundage on x

  (very low confidence / low stakes prediction but just for the sake of concreteness + falsifiability) I'm guessing OpenAI praises the WH proposal and Anthropic says nothing

• @stevescalise Steve Scalise on x

  America must lead in AI — not China. 🇺🇸 The Trump Administration just released a roadmap to unleash innovation, protect consumers, and keep kids safe online. House Republicans are ready to get to work. Read our full statement ⬇️ [image]

• @jonschweppe Jon Schweppe on x

  Just read the White House's proposed national policy framework for AI. Very strong. Love the emphasis on age verification and protecting kids online. Looks like the White House will support the efforts of the @HouseCommerce committee. 👏 👏 👏 [image]

• @jayobernolte Rep. Jay Obernolte on x

  I applaud the White House's continued leadership in advancing a national policy framework for artificial intelligence. As this technology rapidly reshapes our economy, workforce, and national security landscape, it is critical that the United States remains at the forefront of

• @aftfuture @aftfuture on x

  Alliance for the Future (AFTF) applauds President Donald J. Trump for his national AI framework announced today. It is a serious effort to protect the public from real harms, not speculative or imaginary ones, while still preserving the conditions that allow American innovation

• @benbrodydc Ben Brody on x

  In no particular order, here are things that struck me about the WH AI framework that I'd like to learn more on (1/?): Does the framework for likeness rights pint to No Fakes act and just how hot will the lobbying get in that?

• @thefireorg @thefireorg on x

  Today, the White House released its national framework for artificial intelligence. FIRE appreciates the proposed protections for expressive rights embodied in the Trump administration's new policy framework for artificial intelligence. There are elements that warrant caution [im…

• @andyjungtech Andy Jung on x

  Many good ideas in the framework. It repeats the phrase “Congress should” twenty-six times. Releasing this was the easy part. The hard is actually getting lawmakers to write the laws.

• @secureainow @secureainow on x

  The White House's federal AI framework is a weak attempt to address the real world harms caused by AI systems today. It is a backroom deal that shields Big Tech from any liability whatsoever. The White House cannot allow AI companies to continue to exploit American citizens,

• @jackclarksf Jack Clark on x

  We're looking forward to sharing ideas in what will certainly be a vigorous debate around data centers, protecting children, security, economic impact, and other issues of national significance.

• @jackclarksf Jack Clark on x

  Speaking as someone who goes to Congress a lot, the White House signaling broad direction and the need for legislators to act is helpful - it should kickstart an important process, and break some logjams.

• @repfedorchak Congresswoman Julie Fedorchak on x

  There's no doubt that AI is rapidly transforming how we live and work. The question now is whether America develops the rules of the road and leads the future of this extremely powerful tool, or if we let adversaries like China set the terms. It cannot be the latter.

• @ashleyrgold Ashley Gold on x

  Catching my eye in the AI framework, on the very bottom... “States should not be permitted to penalize AI developers for a third party's unlawful conduct involving their models.” this sounds a lil Section 230-y!

• @sriramk Sriram Krishnan on x

  On a personal note : I'm very proud of what we have done today in establishing what are going to be some very key issues and rules of the road for AI in America. This was a long process with many people involved that deserve credit ( including many who don't always agree on