/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Apple's product design has improved since Jony Ive left, as it seems to be putting the emphasis back on function over form and is less obsessed with thinness

At one time, even broaching the idea would have been sacrilegious.  But here goes: might Apple Inc.'s product design have improved since the departure of Jony Ive?

Bloomberg Alex Webb

Context & Ripple Effects

When Jony Ive left in 2019, coverage framed it as the end of an era: he had already been shedding day-to-day oversight since the 2015 Watch launch, coming into HQ twice a week, and Apple had begun planning for his exit once software and services overtook hardware in strategic importance. No successor was named to his chief design officer title, with commentary arguing Apple should stop being seen as the singular expression of one person.

First-order effects

  • Apple's design authority is now distributed across the team rather than concentrated in a CDO, and the visible result per Bloomberg is products judged by function rather than thinness — a reversal of the form-first priorities associated with Ive's tenure.

Second-order effects

  • The departure logic holds up: analysts had argued it was the right time precisely because Apple was becoming less hardware-centric, with COO Jeff Williams positioned as the new "product guy" — meaning design now answers to an operations-minded leadership structure rather than a studio.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, the industry template of the visionary designer-auteur whose taste defines a company gives way to distributed product organizations — a shift The Verge's coverage flagged when it declared the era of the singular genius at Apple over, and one other hardware makers will read as permission to do the same.

The trend: Apple is completing its transition from auteur-driven industrial design to distributed, function-first product development that serves its services-weighted strategy.

Discussion

  • @nheagy Nate Heagy on x
    I absolutely agree with this headline: “Apple's Product Design Has Improved Since Jony Ive Left” https://www.bloomberg.com/...
  • @appleproleeks Apple Pro Leeks on x
    @atbwebb The design itself? No. it's suffered. However the functionality of it has improved. Those feet would never fly with Ive. It's heavier and thicker than ever. Also not a Jony trait. Not improved — just become more logical & functional.
  • @atbwebb Alex Webb on x
    I suggest this with baited breath, but has Apple's design actually - gasp - improved since Jony left in 2019? https://www.bloomberg.com/...
  • @reyml10 ReyMl on x
    @MacRumors @rsgnl Functional > pretty
  • @thomasclaburn Thomas Claburn on x
    Still waiting for Apple to move the Lightning port from the belly of its Magic Mouse to its tail. https://www.bloomberg.com/...
  • @primalanomaly Anomaly on x
    @MacRumors @rsgnl I feel like under Steve Jobs and Jony Ive Apple massively prioritised form over function, whilst today they're massively prioritising function over form. I really wish they'd figure out a way to achieve both.
  • @emanuelsa Emanuel Sá on x
    https://www.bloomberg.com/... Not sure what's worse, assuming Ive was responsible for all decisions in such huge design department or the writer not knowing that probably, Ive, was still part of the team who designed todays and to come Apple products?
  • @sirwill @sirwill on x
    I am a firm believer in Function over Form. Yes, it is nice when things look great, but even better when they FUNCTION and have better durability. I would not have switched to MAC if they hadn't added in more ports over the last M1 Macbook. I ♥️ my IPhone! https://www.bloomberg.c…
  • @josejacas @josejacas on x
    @sdw Also how people think these designs come from *one* person and not a team of people working together. Its pretty disrespectful to the Apple Design Team.
  • @sdw Sebastiaan de With on x
    It takes over a year to design, build and ship *software*. These are real, physical products. Apple's design team isn't working on the iPhone 14 today, they're designing the iPhones to be released years from now.
  • @xerusdesign Xerus on x
    Design has definitely declined in my opinion, but functionality being over form is a worthy sacrifice. https://twitter.com/...
  • @jonyiveparody @jonyiveparody on x
    https://twitter.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @jonyiveparody @jonyiveparody on x
    @MacRumors @rsgnl https://twitter.com/...
  • @sdw Sebastiaan de With on x
    And perhaps with this article, we can put to rest the idea that one male leader can take credit for Apple's designs. It's been a team of brilliant people for a long time. I hope that with Ive's departure and Steve's passing that's never normalized again.
  • @sdw Sebastiaan de With on x
    Saw this make the rounds: “Apple's Product Design Has Improved Since Ive Left” I'm blown away that people have no idea how long it takes to actually design & build a product. Do people think the MacBook was designed this year? Ive left less than *two years ago*. Bad clickbait. ht…