/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Microsoft reverses its decision to remove code editing feature Hot Reload in its upcoming .NET 6 SDK, after backlash from the open source community

The Verge Tom Warren

Context & Ripple Effects

This reversal lands a decade into Microsoft's open source pivot, which began with moves like opening up .NET's CoreCLR in 2015. The company had planned to ship .NET 6 with Hot Reload restricted out of the SDK, and the open source community pushed back hard enough within days that the decision was undone entirely.

The episode matters because the same feature anchors the Visual Studio roadmap: weeks later Microsoft launched Visual Studio 2022 with Hot Reload alongside .NET 6, meaning the community fight shaped a headline capability of the release rather than a side detail.

First-order effects

  • .NET developers get Hot Reload in the .NET 6 SDK itself, and the CLI-based workflow stays intact instead of being gated toward Visual Studio.

Second-order effects

Third-order effects

  • The pattern cuts both ways over time — by 2026 Microsoft is reportedly steering developers away from third-party tooling like Claude Code toward GitHub Copilot CLI, suggesting community vetoes shape individual feature decisions while consolidation of the developer toolchain continues at the platform level.

The trend: Microsoft's developer-platform decisions are increasingly negotiated in public, with open source community pressure acting as a recurring override even as the company consolidates its tooling ecosystem.

Discussion

  • @thatcks Chris Siebenmann on x
    Can we trust Microsoft with open source? No, of course not. Nor can we trust Google, Apple, or Facebook. Any appearance of open source friendliness is tactical; it's not and has never been a deep seated cultural value. (Applications to Github are left for Halloween scares.)
  • @vladsavov Vlad Savov on x
    “engineers are angry inside” strikes me as a concise description of their general state of being. https://twitter.com/...
  • @curious_drive @curious_drive on x
    This is why I use .net. they listen. https://devblogs.microsoft.com/ ...
  • @peterzaitsev Peter Zaitsev on x
    Great to see Microsoft listening to Open Source Community https://www.theverge.com/... #opensource
  • @fallenhitokiri Timo Zimmermann on x
    It doesn't matter if you are invested in the dotNet ecosystem, but with VSCode, GtiHub and other tools I'd suggest paying attention to this https://dusted.codes/...
  • @davepermen @davepermen on x
    It's scary to see how often Microsoft forces their people to shut up. There was a huge war with windows phone going. Now they all have to act like it never existed. Doesnt seem like a healthy company, sadly. https://twitter.com/...
  • @starbuxman Josh Long on x
    Good news! They reversed course on this. Right on, @microsoft and 🙏 https://twitter.com/...
  • @isotopp @isotopp on x
    “Can we trust Microsoft with Open Source?” Microsoft removed hot reload from open source dotnet, and actively sabotages better C# support in VS code, because it wants to protect VS Studio. Not smart, and shows that OSS friendly MS still is just a facade. https://dusted.codes/...
  • @ardalis @ardalis on x
    Good article, with some new info at least on the source of the decision. I'm certain most of the .NET engineers with whom I've worked and gotten to know for YEARS are absolutely LIVID about this, and I feel for them and their frustration. 😥 indeed. This was self-inflicted. https:…
  • @mpdreamz Martijn Laarman on x
    While I'm exited for #dotnet hot reload making a return this cycle needs to be broken. Visual Studio and #dotnet become better through rigid design of the CLI and file formats. Stop designing .NET for Visual Studio https://devblogs.microsoft.com/ ... https://twitter.com/...
  • @peterzaitsev Peter Zaitsev on x
    The second worst thing you can do after taking Open Source code proprietary is remove Open Source code between Beta and Release https://dusted.codes/...
  • @tomwarren Tom Warren on x
    Microsoft has now reversed its decision, 24 hours after our reporting https://www.theverge.com/...
  • @tomwarren Tom Warren on x
    Microsoft has reversed its controversial .NET 6 decision after a public outcry from the open source community. The company says “Hot Reload capability will be in the general availability build of the .NET 6 SDK available on November 8th.” Full details: https://www.theverge.com/..…
  • @tomwarren Tom Warren on x
    a lot of MS folks and .NET community members have got in touch privately to share their stories about this and other decisions. My Signal number is in my profile 🙏 https://twitter.com/...