/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Analysis: Tencent and Alibaba, whose stocks have dropped 60% and 65% respectively since February 2021, have lost more market value than any other stock globally

Bloomberg Jeanny Yu

Context & Ripple Effects

This is the endpoint of a three-act repricing. Tencent's first wobble came in 2018, when a 25% slide erased $143B on growth doubts alone; then Beijing's [[a:1159394|crackdown wiped a combined $823B off Tencent, Alibaba, and Kuaishou at the February 2021 peak]]. What the new analysis adds is scale: at down 60% and 65% respectively since February 2021, the two firms have destroyed more shareholder value than any other listed company on earth.

The follow-on coverage confirms it wasn't a dip: weeks later Tencent had fallen 64% from January 2021 and ceded its spot as China's most valuable company, shedding $623B on its own. For global funds, the question shifts from timing the bottom to whether either firm has an engine left that can rebuild valuation.

First-order effects

  • Global investors in Tencent and Alibaba are sitting through the two largest absolute market-value losses of any stocks worldwide — a 60–65% drawdown that resets both firms' currency for acquisitions, stock-based compensation, and index weight.
  • Alibaba's own reporting shows why the multiple compressed: quarterly net income down over 75% despite revenue up 9%, squeezed by heavy AI spending and weak Chinese retail consumption.

Second-order effects

  • Portfolio managers benchmarked against global indices are forced to cut China-tech exposure mechanically as the weights shrink, deepening the selling beyond what fundamentals alone would justify.
  • Alibaba's response is to spend into the trough — open-sourcing Qwen models under Apache 2.0 and passing 3 billion downloads in six months — trading near-term margin for relevance in the AI stack, while its shares recover more than 40% from June lows.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, Chinese platform giants stop being valued as consumer-growth compounds and get re-rated as regulated infrastructure whose upside depends on an AI pivot — a shift the later coverage keeps testing, with the Hang Seng Tech Index still shedding nearly $600B as recently as the October 2025 peak's aftermath.
  • The precedent makes regulatory risk a permanent discount line in every valuation model for Chinese listings, not a one-off event premium.

The trend: China's platform giants are being structurally re-priced from consumer-growth stories into regulated, AI-capex-heavy utilities, with Beijing's policy cycle — not earnings — setting the valuation floor.

Discussion

  • @technology @technology on x
    Next week, Tencent will seek to assure investors about its outlook during second-quarter results. They won't be easy to convince https://www.bloomberg.com/...