/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

IEEE stops accepting papers with the “Lenna image”, featuring a 1972 Playboy model, after complaints that it makes some women feel unwelcome in computer science

Ars Technica Benj Edwards

Context & Ripple Effects

The Lenna image has long appeared in coverage of computing's broader gender problem: earlier reporting connected its use to sexist undercurrents in Silicon Valley. The issue is therefore not simply a dispute over an illustration, but over which inherited technical conventions professional institutions continue to legitimize.

The decision also lands amid repeated evidence that image technologies can reproduce gendered treatment, including reports of Lensa generating sexualized avatars for a female user. IEEE's policy makes the provenance and social meaning of a research image a publication-compliance question.

First-order effects

  • Authors submitting to IEEE must replace the Lenna image, while editors gain a clear basis to reject papers that retain it.
  • IEEE formally distances its publications from a widely recognized legacy test image whose origin conflicts with efforts to make computing more welcoming.

Second-order effects

  • Other publishers, conferences, course materials, and software documentation that still use the image face greater pressure to adopt alternative standard images.
  • Replacement images can become the new shared reference materials, reducing reliance on a legacy convention that had persisted partly through habit and interoperability.

Third-order effects

  • If replicated across research institutions, publication rules will increasingly govern not only technical validity but also the cultural provenance of commonly reused datasets, examples, and visuals.
  • The broader shift is toward treating inclusion as part of research infrastructure: standards bodies can alter field norms by changing what is admissible in formal venues.

The trend: Technical institutions are revising inherited research conventions as governance choices that shape who feels represented in the field.

Discussion

  • @davemark@mastodon.social Dave Mark on mastodon
    I had NO idea this was a thing...  “Lenna is a standard test image used in the field of digital image processing starting in 1973, but it is no longer considered appropriate by some authors.  It is a picture of the Swedish model Lena Forsén, shot by photographer Dwight Hooker, cr…
  • @shivoa@mastodon.gamedev.place Dr Jess Birch on mastodon
    A better Lena: https://mortenhannemose.github.io/ lena/  (Context: https://arstechnica.com/... - IEEE have finally removed it from the acceptable list of common test samples.)
  • @mikepfrank @mikepfrank on x
    In today's email from the IEEE Computer Society [image]
  • @ezioaks Akshay Anand on x
    Lots of butthurt incels decrying the fall of civilisation in the replies of this one. They won't let facts get in the way of their feelings damnit!
  • @basked_samosa @basked_samosa on x
    i once discovered the full image and the story behind it and now it always makes me chuckle whenever i come across this image in an ml paper
  • @zoidctf Zoid Kirsch on x
    While it's important to remember the history of this image and how it was used to further computer image processing, it is time to move onto newer test images. Lenna herself asked to move on in 2019. What should be the test images of the future?
  • @cherthedev Cher Scarlett on x
    We have many naked or neatly naked women to go, but progress is progress!
  • @timdarcet @timdarcet on x
    If you need a replacement for an example image in a CV paper, you know what to do [image]
  • @hlibivanov @hlibivanov on x
    A whole-ass age has just ended
  • @o_guest @o_guest on x
    It's also what she's been asking for. So extra good.
  • @sushantdave1729 Sushant Dave on x
    Anyone who had anything to do even remotely with Image Processing would have seen this picture. I must have looked at this picture in different formats and resolutions, over 10,000 times, literally. Suddenly feeling old.
  • @zanyfen @zanyfen on x
    Frankly embarrassing that it took this long
  • @zhil_arf @zhil_arf on x
    Audition for who's the best girl thay shall replace Ms Forsen worldwide just dropped [image]
  • @yacinemtb Kache on x
    if you're looking for a replacement for an example image in a CV paper, you know what to do [image]
  • @mikepfrank @mikepfrank on x
    For those asking what “the wishes of the subject of the image” is referring to [image]
  • @jsroest Sander Roest on x
    This image of “Lenna” brings back some sweet memories of my graduate assignment at Océ in '97 where I was working on a subpixel positioning system for copy machines. This image was mentioned there as the standard image for graphical processing. https://arstechnica.com/... [image]
  • @fahad_s_ali Fahad Ali on x
    This cropped image, taken from Playboy, has been used for five decades as a standard in image processing research. Finally, the IEEE follows other major academic publishers in prohibiting its use. And people wonder why there aren't more women in STEM. https://www.404media.co/...
  • @thibaut_barrere Thibaut Barrère on x
    Farewell to Lenna, the well-known “sample for image compression / processing” pervasively used over the years https://arstechnica.com/.... [image]
  • @jimpethokoukis James Pethokoukis on x
    seems a bit prudish ◾️ Playboy image from 1972 gets ban from IEEE computer journals: Use of “Lenna” image in computer image processing research stretches back to the 1970s. https://arstechnica.com/...
  • @the_moisrex @the_moisrex on x
    We probably should've used a better image from the get go, or just not make a single image the holy icon of image processing. https://arstechnica.com/... [image]
  • @liasae Lia on x
    Also in “Jeebus that took a while” (I've softened my stance on the actual image a lot, I now mostly believe it's just not great test data anymore anyway, but the *reaction* of the field to criticism was the big tell) https://arstechnica.com/...
  • @rachelmetz Rachel Metz on x
    A big deal: @IEEEorg will stop accepting papers containing the Lena image — a photo published in Playboy & used for decades in image-processing research. It's a fascinating tale about how women are deeply embedded in the history of technology, whether we consent or not.
  • @xsphi Tess on x
    Banning Lena in the current legislative and cultural environment sends a clear message. It shows the length some are willing to go to expunge women (and especially sex workers) from the history of technology.
  • @jjvincent James Vincent on x
    interesting that the Lena image — a computer vision benchmark that's also a Playboy centerfold — is now banned from IEEE papers as of April 1st. I wrote a little bit about its use for the LRB back in 2022 https://lrb.co.uk/... https://twitter.com/... [image]
  • @mikepfrank @mikepfrank on x
    Just FYI, computer vision papers submitted to IEEE that include this image of Ms. Forsén will no longer be considered for publication [image]
  • r/programming r on reddit
    Playboy image from 1972 gets ban from IEEE computer journals
  • r/worldnews r on reddit
    Playboy image from 1972 gets ban from IEEE computer journals