Paul Mozur

China figures in 28 of 44 associated stories, anchoring Paul Mozur’s coverage of technology as a force in state power, surveillance and AI competition.

Who they are

Paul Mozur appears in this coverage as a New York Times journalist whose reporting connects China’s technology sector and information controls with the wider geopolitical and social consequences of digital systems. The stories range from Chinese manufacturing, Huawei and platform censorship to AI-driven military, labor and infrastructure shifts across Ukraine, India, Saudi Arabia and Chile.

The recent arc

Coverage peaked in 2018Q1, amid reporting that included Myanmar civil-society groups challenging Mark Zuckerberg’s account of Facebook’s hate-speech detection and a wider run of stories on Chinese technology and control. Earlier high-impact work examined China’s subsidized Foxconn manufacturing hub in Zhengzhou, app-store registration rules, Twitter enforcement against users in China, Huawei’s U.S. litigation and the alleged Supermicro supply-chain intrusion affecting companies including Amazon and Apple.

More recently, the focus has moved from platform governance and China’s domestic digital ecosystem toward AI’s international economic and security effects. A 2024 report described Ukraine adapting consumer technology into autonomous weapons, while 2025 stories examined Saudi data-center ambitions amid U.S.-China competition and Chilean debates over AI investment. In 2026, reporting turned to India’s outsourcing sector confronting white-collar automation and Asian hardware companies benefiting from the AI boom as U.S. curbs sideline China.

The tension

The central tension is that the technologies promising scale and growth—social platforms, global supply chains, AI infrastructure and inexpensive consumer hardware—also expand the capacity for censorship, surveillance and warfare. China and Beijing are the dominant reference points, with Facebook, Twitter and Huawei recurring as platforms or companies caught between state policy, public accountability and geopolitical competition; the Ukraine reporting explicitly frames AI-enabled weaponization as an emerging “killer robots” problem.

Why it matters

If this trajectory holds, the coverage suggests that AI will be less a discrete industry story than a layer reshaping national industrial policy, labor markets, military capability and the power of digital platforms. The unresolved question is whether governments, companies and affected communities can secure economic gains without deepening coercive surveillance, environmental conflict or the spread of low-cost autonomous weapons.

Related: China · New York Times · Beijing · Facebook · Twitter · Huawei