/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Study: programmers who use GitHub Copilot and other AI tools produce less secure code than those who do not, despite believing their code has no safety issues

At the same time, tools like Github Copilot and Facebook InCoder make developers believe their code is sound

The Register Thomas Claburn

Discussion

  • @timmisiak Tim Misiak on x
    Oh good. Job security. https://arxiv.org/...
  • @weldpond Chris Wysopal on x
    “Computer scientists from Stanford University have found that programmers who accept help from AI tools like Github Copilot produce less secure code than those who fly solo.” Looks like there will be a market for AI vuln remediation! https://www.theregister.com/ ...
  • @divergencearran Arran on x
    Hardly surprising that AI-assisted developers write worse code https://arxiv.org/... The AI-generated code I've seen lies in the “uncanny valley” of software—looks right but there's something subtly incorrect. Couple that with automation bias and it's a recipe for bugs.