Experts warn of a “hallucination” problem with ChatGPT and LaMDA, as these chatbots take what they have learned and reshape it without regard for what is true
Siri, Google Search, online marketing and your child's homework will never be the same. Then there's the misinformation problem.
New York TimesCade Metz
Context & Ripple Effects
The warning arrived as Google was reportedly weighing LaMDA's reputational risk against the danger of conceding ground to ChatGPT. That makes reliability a competitive constraint, not merely a model-quality issue.
Later coverage described ChatGPT filling missing information with plausible language and found it can repeat misleading narratives in convincing prose. The issue matters more as assistants are placed in search and voice interfaces, including Siri's reported ChatGPT search integration.
First-order effects
ChatGPT and LaMDA face an immediate credibility problem: polished answers cannot be treated as dependable merely because they sound authoritative.
Google's decision on LaMDA becomes a trade-off between moving quickly against ChatGPT and limiting reputational damage from inaccurate outputs.
Second-order effects
Google Search and Siri integrations must make room for verification signals such as linked sources, because an assistant's fluent response can otherwise displace a user from checking underlying information.
As assistants become a work surface for search and voice tasks, differentiation shifts from generating answers to establishing which answers users can verify and trust.
The pattern points to generative systems accumulating editorial debt: wider distribution raises the cost of each ungrounded response for the platforms that embed them.
The trend: Generative assistants are moving into high-distribution interfaces while reliability and provenance become central competitive requirements.
Siri, Google Search, online marketing and your child's homework will never be the same thanks to new and more advanced chat bots. But then there's the misinformation problem. https://www.nytimes.com/...
A new generation of chatbots could eventually change how we learn and find information online. But like a great screenwriter, they have a habit of stretching the truth. https://www.nytimes.com/...
“You could program millions of these bots to appear like humans, having conversations designed to convince people of a particular point of view. I have warned about this for years. Now it is obvious that this is just waiting to happen.” https://www.nytimes.com/...
AI text is very much not just a toy anymore, and there are already some fascinating real-world use cases. But there are also some serious downsides; it's like “this hand grenade rolling down the hallway toward everything.” Here's how ChatGPT puts it: https://www.washingtonpost.co…
New: Stumbling with their words, some people let AI do the talking. ChatGPT is saying all the things people wish they could say to their clients, landlords, girlfriends and kids. It's also a great cheating tool, secretly racist and often deceptively wrong https://www.washingtonpo…
Google employees explain why we haven't seen ChatGPT like functionality in their products; the cost to serve an AI result is 10x to 100x as high as a regular web search today plus they're too slow relative to how quick search results must be returned. https://twitter.com/...
These two paragraphs are a business strategy case. Google has a massive business model built on assumptions about how search works. It could win the AI battle, but at the cost of its business. (👀 also, Google's internal AI is much better than ChatGPT!) https://bigtechnology.subst…
ChatGPT will likely play out exactly as innovator's dilemma suggests. To an expert in any given field, it has worse answers. But most people don't have access to experts for everything, so it actually is a productivity boost to everyone else.
I don't actually care about AI in search results, I just want to slowly fall in love with the virtual representative of a multinational corporation that lives in a wireless speaker as a form of dystopic performance art https://twitter.com/...
Interesting... maybe there is space for both? Quick, free search (current Google search) Paid (subscription model?), slow search (ChatGPT like) https://twitter.com/...
Does Google have a Kodak problem? Kodak invented digital photography and patented the first portable digital camera, but they were wedded to the film cash cow. Is Google sitting on AI because it doesn't want to kill the ad business cash cow? https://twitter.com/...
“The company makes money when people click ads next to search results, and it's awkward to fit ads into conversational replies. Imagine receiving a response and then immediately getting pitched to go somewhere else — it feels slimy, and unhelpful” https://twitter.com/...
How did Google get beat by OpenAI on ChatGPT? It's long promised that the future of search will be conversational. I spoke with some people who've worked inside the company. It wasn't a blind spot. https://bigtechnology.substack.com/ ... via @BigTechnology