/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Filing: US bank Silvergate confirms processing wire transfers for traders on Alameda, claiming to have conducted “extensive due diligence” on FTX and Alameda

Federal Reserve-regulated company says it performed ‘significant due diligence’ on FTX and Alameda Research

Financial Times Joshua Oliver

Context & Ripple Effects

Silvergate’s filing places a regulated bank inside the FTX-Alameda payment network while asserting it had vetted both firms. That assertion sits uneasily beside reports that FTX had lent customer money to Alameda, including the reported $10B Alameda obligation to FTX.

The disclosure became a focal point as coverage turned to congressional scrutiny of Silvergate’s crypto-exchange banking role and, later, a reported DOJ fraud-unit investigation into the bank’s FTX- and Alameda-linked accounts.

First-order effects

  • Silvergate must defend the scope and effectiveness of its stated due diligence as its wire-transfer relationship with Alameda becomes part of the FTX collapse’s financial record.
  • FTX and Alameda’s banking arrangements receive added scrutiny because the filing identifies a Federal Reserve-regulated institution that processed trader transfers.

Second-order effects

  • Other banks serving crypto exchanges face sharper questions from lawmakers and customers about how account monitoring and due diligence distinguish exchange activity from affiliated trading-firm activity.
  • Alameda’s earlier purchase of control of a small US-licensed bank gains added relevance, emphasizing how access to regulated dollar-payment channels became strategically important to the FTX group.

Third-order effects

  • If scrutiny continues to focus on the banks linking crypto exchanges, trading affiliates, and customers, access to regulated payment rails will increasingly be treated as a governance test rather than a routine banking service.
  • The episode reinforces the crypto legitimacy gap: regulated intermediaries can confer operational access without resolving conflicts or controls within the crypto firms they serve.

The trend: Crypto firms’ dependence on regulated banking partners is turning bank due diligence and payment-rail oversight into a central accountability issue after major exchange failures.

Discussion

  • @katie_martin_fx Katie Martin on x
    US bank Silvergate has defended its role in accepting deposits for Sam Bankman-Fried's conglomerate, saying it conducted “extensive due diligence” on crypto exchange FTX and trading shop Alameda Research. https://www.ft.com/...
  • @hkanji Hussein Kanji on x
    We conducted extensive due diligence on FTX and Alameda Research https://www.sec.gov/...
  • @eliotwb Eliot Brown on x
    We did extensive due diligence on company that didn't have a CFO, bank says https://twitter.com/...