/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

In its Q3 Adversarial Threat Report, Meta attributes a pro-US campaign to US military-run phony Facebook accounts, Pages, Groups, and Instagram accounts

People associated with the U.S. military were behind dozens of phony Facebook accounts, more than a dozen pages, a pair of groups

CyberScoop AJ Vicens

Context & Ripple Effects

Meta had already documented and disrupted Belarus- and Russia-linked operations targeting Ukrainians. This report expands that integrity work to a pro-US network associated with the U.S. military, making the platform's attribution process consequential for a partner government as well as adversaries.

Related coverage says the Pentagon planned an audit of its online clandestine information warfare after platforms removed pro-US operations. The episode therefore connects platform enforcement to oversight of how government-linked influence activity is conducted.

First-order effects

  • The U.S. military and people associated with it face public attribution for the use of phony Facebook and Instagram assets, while Meta formally records the activity as an adversarial threat.
  • Meta's report places Facebook, Groups, and Instagram at the center of scrutiny over the network's use of coordinated inauthentic identities.

Second-order effects

  • The Pentagon's planned audit turns platform action against pro-US operations into an internal review issue for the U.S. military rather than solely a content-moderation matter.
  • Meta's willingness to disclose the attribution raises the stakes for government information-sharing with the company; later, Meta officials said the U.S. stopped proactively sharing information on foreign influence operations.

Third-order effects

  • If platforms continue publicly attributing state-linked networks irrespective of alignment, adversarial-threat reporting becomes a recurring accountability channel for governments' online influence operations.
  • The pattern shifts influence-operation oversight toward a shared boundary: governments may run campaigns, but platforms control the identities and distribution systems those campaigns rely on.

The trend: Platform integrity teams are becoming more willing to expose government-linked influence networks, turning account enforcement into a constraint on state information operations.

Discussion

  • @vatsrishap @vatsrishap on x
    “People associated with the U.S. military were behind dozens of phony Facebook accounts, more than a dozen pages, a pair of groups and 26 Instagram accounts that pushed pro-US messaging while attempting to hide their real identities, Meta said in a report” https://www.cyberscoop.…
  • @benimmo Ben Nimmo on x
    The US op — linked to individuals associated w/US military — ran on Twitter, YT, Telegram, VK, OK, blogs, websites. Fake accounts targeted: 🇦🇫Afghanistan 🇩🇿Algeria 🇮🇷Iran 🇮🇶Iraq 🇰🇿Kazakhstan 🇰🇬Kyrgyzstan 🇷🇺Russia 🇸🇴Somalia 🇸🇾Syria 🇹🇯Tajikistan 🇺🇿Uzbekistan 🇾🇪Yemen
  • @guyro Guy Rosen on x
    Today we're publishing: ☑️our Community Standards Enforcement Report for Q3 2022 ☑️Q3 Widely-Viewed Content Report ☑️Q3 Oversight Board Quarterly Report ☑️Q3 Adversarial Threat Report ☑️the Transparency Report for H1 2022 https://about.fb.com/... (1/7)
  • @lukolejnik @lukolejnik on x
    American information operations identified and taken down. “We removed accounts Pages, Groups, accounts on Instagram. This network originated in the United States ... our investigation found links to individuals associated with the US military” https://about.fb.com/..."
  • @ivanastradner @ivanastradner on x
    This is unacceptable! While Russia and China are waging information war against USA, Meta removed 🇺🇸 network — linked the US military! Are you people ok? It is way past time for 🇺🇸 to re-evaluate social-media platforms from a national security perspective. https://about.fb.com/..…
  • @joetidy Joe Tidy on x
    Meta confirms what we all suspected - that pro-western influence op it took down in summer was the US. The operation was notable for being... a bit crap. “Although the people behind it attempted to conceal their identities we found links to individuals linked to US military.” htt…
  • @davidagranovich David Agranovich on x
    1/ We just shared multiple policy enforcement reports including our quarterly Adversarial Threat Report and Widely Viewed Content Report (WVCR). A couple things to highlight: 🧵 ATR: https://about.fb.com/... WVCR: https://about.fb.com/...
  • @nakashimae Ellen Nakashima on x
    Meta confirms U.S.-military links to global clandestine info operation following WaPo reporting in September that the Pentagon was conducting a sweeping audit of such psyops— including in particular by Centcom. https://about.fb.com/...
  • @benimmo Ben Nimmo on x
    We reported on the latter two networks in September: https://twitter.com/... Since September, the Russian op has kept adding new domains. We've blocked them and updated threat indicators here so others can detect them too: https://about.fb.com/...
  • @evaristegal0is @evaristegal0is on x
    Well, now we have a Meta report about a US network associated with the US military. This report is important 🤯 https://about.fb.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @davidagranovich David Agranovich on x
    2/ In addition to the networks from China and Russia that we first reported in Sept, we're also sharing findings about the US-based op linked to the individuals associated with the US military https://about.fb.com/...
  • @guyro Guy Rosen on x
    The team continues to share threat intel findings about coordinated adversarial networks that we counter, including with independent security researchers and industry peers, so we can raise our collective defenses. More on our disruptions here: https://twitter.com/... (7/7)
  • @paulszoldra Paul Szoldra on x
    “The US network — linked to individuals associated with the US military — operated across many internet services and focused on Afghanistan, Algeria, Iran, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Somalia, Syria, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Yemen.” https://twitter.com/...
  • @wsj @wsj on x
    Facebook's third-quarter Widely Viewed Content Report shows only one in the top 20 posts qualified as engagement bait, down from 100% a year earlier https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @kevinroose Kevin Roose on x
    @JeffHorwitz I guess it's good that the WVCR created some soul-searching and platform improvements, but the whole thing started as a very cynical decoy! (And a ground-laying step for getting rid of CrowdTangle.)
  • @jeffhorwitz Jeff Horwitz on x
    Short version: Facebook's top content is no longer, by the company's own admission, 100% trashy. https://www.wsj.com/... Longer version below.
  • @kyurieff Kaya Yurieff on x
    Earlier this year, Meta Platforms quietly convened a war room of staffers to address a critical problem: virtually all of Facebook's top-ranked content was spammy, oversexualized or generally what the company classified as regrettable. New from WSJ: https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @jeffhorwitz Jeff Horwitz on x
    @kevinroose It was probably more Reels in combo with WVCR that forced this, but WVCR revealed more warts than I had expected the company to show. No question that the CT team's dissolution was a failure in the transparency department. I hadn't thought of WVCR as a precursor to it…
  • @kevinroose Kevin Roose on x
    @JeffHorwitz It seems odd not to note that the WVCR was designed and launched as a marketing/PR exercise to steer attention away from one “quality problem.” (Highly-engaged political content.) That it revealed another one (spam and garbage) was an accident!
  • @benimmo Ben Nimmo on x
    JUST OUT: @meta's Adversarial Threat Report for Q3, 2022. Three takedowns for Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior, from USA, Russia, China. https://about.fb.com/...
  • @nohackme Mick Baccio on x
    fantastic work in this 🧵 https://twitter.com/...
  • @dannygroner Danny Groner on x
    “What it showed instead was that among the billions of posts made to the platform, the ones getting the most views—meaning they were actively promoted by the social network's recommendation systems—were generally trashy.” https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @davidclinchnews David Clinch on x
    “The content that did (in most recent report) receive top billing on the platform was a mixture of celebrity news, meme pages and Reels videos.” https://twitter.com/...
  • @anthony Anthony DeRosa on x
    Earlier this year, Meta convened a war room of staffers to address a critical problem: virtually all of Facebook's top-ranked content was spammy, oversexualized, or generally what the company classified as regrettable https://www.wsj.com/...