/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

LG Gram 17 review: under three pounds, even with a huge 17", 2560 x 1600 display, but the graphics are weak, the chassis is flimsy, and it's pricey at $1,600+

Monica Chin / The Verge :

The Verge Monica Chin

Context & Ripple Effects

LG has been running the same Gram playbook since it entered the US laptop market in 2015 with $899 ultrabooks: strip the chassis to hit an aggressive weight target and accept the structural cost. The recurring verdicts tell the story — the original 14-inch Gram was dinged for a flimsy build and screen wobble, and the 17-inch line arrived in 2018 as a 2.9lb clamshell pitched on battery life rather than power.

This review shows the formula intact at a higher price point: a huge 2560 x 1600 panel under three pounds, but weak graphics, a bendy chassis, and $1,600+. The interesting comparison in the coverage is Razer, whose Blade 18 buys a gigantic high-refresh display with real power at $3,800 — the opposite end of the big-screen trade-off.

First-order effects

  • Buyers shopping a 17-inch screen get a clear either/or: LG's machine wins decisively on carried weight but concedes graphics performance and build rigidity to heavier rivals like Razer's Blades.
  • At $1,600+, LG is asking ultrabook money for a chassis that reviewers keep flagging as flimsy — the price now sits well above the $899 entry point that launched the line.

Second-order effects

  • Razer's premium big-screen laptops face no pressure from this product on performance; the competitive boundary hardens into weight-versus-power, letting Razer defend its $2,400–$3,800 pricing against a cheaper-but-weaker alternative rather than a direct rival.
  • LG's own follow-up, the Gram Style with its OLED panel and color-changing body, repeats the pattern — lightweight and bold design, again limited by thermals and a bendy chassis — suggesting the trade-off is a deliberate line identity, not a one-off miss.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, the 17-inch-and-up laptop market splits structurally into two camps — featherweight productivity machines and heavy performance machines — with little middle ground, because the physics of thin, light chassis keeps capping thermal headroom.
  • LG's eight-year consistency on this trade-off points to a brand position built on portability alone; whether that sustains $1,600+ pricing without durability improvements is the open question the review raises.

The trend: Large-screen laptops are polarizing into ultra-light productivity machines and heavy performance machines, with LG Gram holding the light end and Razer's Blades anchoring the powerful end.

Discussion

  • @mgsiegler M.G. Siegler on x
    Yeah, but it also has awesome Intel and Alexa stickers on it. If you pay $1,800 do you get to remove those ads? https://twitter.com/...