/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

MPCH Labs, which is developing a cryptographic technique to split and store private keys for multiple users, raised a $40M Series A led by Liberty City Ventures

Brandy Betz / CoinDesk :

CoinDesk Brandy Betz

Context & Ripple Effects

MPCH Labs' $40M Series A lands in the middle of a sustained funding run on the key-management stack itself. Within months of this round, Magic raised $52M led by PayPal Ventures for wallet-creation SDKs, Unchained Capital pulled in a $60M Series B for Bitcoin cold-storage services, and OneKey raised ~$20M from Dragonfly and Ribbit Capital for certified-chip hardware wallets — investors are backing every layer of how private keys get held.

What distinguishes MPCH is the approach: rather than securing a key in one place — a chip, a vault, a custodian — it is building cryptographic splitting so a key is stored across multiple users by design. That puts it in structural competition with the single-point-of-trust models the rest of the coverage is funding.

First-order effects

  • Liberty City Ventures takes a lead position in a company whose product removes the need to trust any single key holder — directly relevant to the custodians and hardware vendors that currently anchor the market.
  • Wallet builders choosing between architectures now have a well-funded MPC option alongside the SDK route (Magic) and the low-level infrastructure route (Turnkey's $30M Series B).

Second-order effects

  • Hardware wallet makers like OneKey, whose pitch rests on a certified secure chip, face a rival trust model where security comes from key distribution rather than device tamper-resistance — forcing them to argue hardware and software assumptions, not just features.
  • Cold-storage service providers such as Unchained Capital see their 'trusted third party holds the key' economics challenged by schemes where no party ever holds the whole key.

Third-order effects

  • If the funding cadence across these layers continues, key custody consolidates into a stack where cryptographic splitting becomes the default for shared and institutional wallets, shifting the security debate from who you trust to how the math distributes trust.

The trend: Venture capital is systematically funding every layer of crypto key management — chips, SDKs, cold storage, and now key-splitting cryptography — as wallet infrastructure matures into its own asset class.

Discussion

  • @us_supremeshort Griffin McShane on x
    Now that the word is out... Excited to share that I've joined the @fractionnews team to help build the future of blockchain and web3🍾 https://www.theblock.co/...