/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

The new Apple Watches' S8 chip appears to have the same CPU as the S6 and S7, which may explain why Apple has lately only used the S5 or earlier for comparisons

Hartley Charlton / MacRumors :

MacRumors Hartley Charlton

Context & Ripple Effects

Apple had presented the Series 6 as a faster-CPU upgrade, while the lower-priced Watch SE used the older S5; that makes the S8's apparent CPU reuse a meaningful break from the earlier Series 6 performance step. A July report had already tied slower progress in Apple's non-Mac chips to its growing Mac-chip investment.

The subsequent S9 performance jump—described as 30% faster than the S8—marks a clearer new Watch silicon generation, rather than a continuation of the S6-to-S8 CPU cadence.

First-order effects

  • Series 8 buyers receive an Apple Watch whose CPU performance appears unchanged from the Series 6 and Series 7, limiting a hardware-upgrade rationale centered on speed.
  • Apple's use of S5-or-earlier comparisons avoids directly framing the S8 against the two immediately preceding watches that appear to share its CPU.

Second-order effects

  • The S5-based Watch SE becomes a more useful performance reference point for Apple’s lineup, while Series 6 and Series 7 owners have less CPU-driven reason to replace their watches.
  • Apple’s chip-investment trade-offs become more visible in wearables: the reported slowdown outside Mac chips aligns with a Watch generation focused on changes other than a new CPU.

Third-order effects

  • If Apple continues to stagger major Watch-silicon updates, Watch upgrade cycles will be defined less by annual CPU gains and more by sensors, displays, and interaction features until a new chip generation arrives.
  • The later S9 launch suggests Apple can concentrate a larger performance and on-device capability shift into a distinct silicon refresh, rather than distributing smaller CPU gains every year.

The trend: Apple Watch silicon appears to be moving toward less frequent, more consequential CPU refreshes as Apple allocates chip-development attention across its product lines.

Discussion

  • @appleswupdates @appleswupdates on x
    According to the device identifiers of the Series 8/Ultra/SE 2 Apple Watch, the S8 SiP chip is the same as the S7 which is the same as the S6 #AppleEvent
  • @stroughtonsmith Steve Troughton-Smith on x
    Last I checked, the S8 inside new Apple Watch is basically the same chip as S7 in last year's, which is basically the same as the S6 in the year prior. Why has CPU progress in Apple's smallest iOS device effectively stalled? Has the M-series (and headset) sucked up all oxygen? 🤔
  • @vadimyuryev Vadim Yuryev on x
    Apple is likely waiting for 3nm to get ready? https://twitter.com/...