/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

As the market downturn sees some US tech investors and startups hunkering down, others continue as normal; Q2 average investment deal sizes are at record levels

Market correction leaves some startups in crisis as others take employees on vacation  —  Why a 2022 Recession Would Be Unlike Any Other

Wall Street Journal Heather Somerville

Context & Ripple Effects

This is the second act of a correction that began earlier in the year, when tech stocks' poor IPO performance pushed some venture firms to start cutting back investments and renegotiating startup valuations. By Q2 the pullback had produced a strange split: PitchBook's data shows average deal sizes at record levels even as many investors and founders hunker down.

The split echoes the pandemic-era pattern, when US funds raised $21B across 62 funds in Q1 2020 yet concentrated $34.2B into 27% fewer deals than a year earlier — dollars kept flowing while the number of recipients shrank. The later retrospectives of 2022 as a dismal year for startups confirm where this trajectory ended.

First-order effects

  • Startups divide into two camps immediately: those facing crisis-mode renegotiations and those flush enough to send employees on vacation, with the record Q2 average deal size meaning new money concentrates in fewer, larger rounds rather than spreading broadly.
  • Investors who pulled back after the IPO slump now compete only on selective deals, raising the bar for which startups can still raise at all.

Second-order effects

  • Mid-sized startups outside the mega-round cohort face a narrowing path: with average sizes at records but overall activity contracting, they are squeezed between scarce small checks and large rounds reserved for proven names.
  • The 2020 precedent suggests limited partners and funds respond by consolidating into fewer, bigger bets — pressuring smaller funds that cannot write record-size checks to specialize or exit.

Third-order effects

  • If the barbell holds, US venture structurally polarizes into a mega-deal tier and a frozen long tail, prefiguring the plummeting investment and scarce public listings that made 2023 look even harder than 2022.
  • Repeated cycles of 'dollars up, deals down' normalize concentration of venture capital, making access to funding itself a competitive moat for the few rather than a commodity for the many.

The trend: US venture capital is polarizing during downturns — record average deal sizes coexisting with a broad funding freeze — concentrating capital in fewer, larger bets each cycle.

Discussion

  • @martinsfp @martinsfp on x
    This reads like an obituary, but this bit made me laugh: “Many venture capitalists now admit their market was overcome by a race to invest at almost any price — though most like to claim their own funds were able to sidestep the worst of the excesses” https://www.ft.com/...
  • @mylesudland Myles Udland on x
    Fun to look at this chart and think about how the venture bubble was a popular talking point back in like '14-'15 https://www.ft.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @lisaabramowicz1 Lisa Abramowicz on x
    “Many companies are going to be in denial about the change in valuations until they run out of capital.” https://www.ft.com/...
  • @heathersomervil Heather Somerville on x
    Silicon Valley is a mess of contradictions in this novel market downturn. Some startups are making painful cuts. Others are taking their employees on beach-resort getaways and raising their largest-ever funding. https://www.wsj.com/... @wsj
  • @apartovi Ali Partovi on x
    I'm pleased to be cited in today's WSJ. The quote attributed to me is a bit inaccurate. We're definitely in a downturn; except in this one, the way for early-stage startups to win is make bold bets rather than slash costs and hoard cash. Here are my notes for the WSJ interview. h…
  • @trengriffin Tren Griffin on x
    Consultants are trained to create a matrix. Example: On one axis is positive cash flow and negative cash flow. On the other axis is attractive unit economics and ugly unit economics. Most dangerous quadrant: negative cash flow and ugly unit economics. https://www.wsj.com/...