/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR ▲
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Experts say it is not clear whether generative art made by AI systems trained on copyrighted data, like OpenAI's DALL-E 2, can be considered as fair use

but not the most important ones relating to the use of existing © works to train AI. https://www.wired.com/... @maasgad : “Is it right that the AIs of the future are able to produce something magical on the backs of our labor, potentially without our consent or compensation?” https://www.engadget.com/... Andrew Tarantola / @terrortola : Is generative art truly unique if the AI that made it was trained using copyrighted data scraped from the internet? If seeing and doing is good enough for a monkey, why not Dall-E? @danielwcooper investigates https://www.engadget.com/... John Bergmayer / @bergmayer : if there is no “substantial similarity” between the source material and the result, the result is not a “copy” so you don't even need fair use https://www.engadget.com/...

Engadget Daniel Cooper

Related Coverage

Discussion

  • @bergmayer John Bergmayer on x
    if there is no “substantial similarity” between the source material and the result, the result is not a “copy” so you don't even need fair use https://www.engadget.com/...
  • @neilturkewitz Neil Turkewitz on x
    “By giving users commercial usage rights, OpenAI is sidestepping some of the tricky IP questions raised by this technology.” @JessicaRizzo19 ⁦@WIRED⁩ Some, perhaps—but not the most important ones relating to the use of existing © works to train AI. https://www.wired.com/...
  • @maasgad @maasgad on x
    “Is it right that the AIs of the future are able to produce something magical on the backs of our labor, potentially without our consent or compensation?” https://www.engadget.com/...
  • @terrortola Andrew Tarantola on x
    Is generative art truly unique if the AI that made it was trained using copyrighted data scraped from the internet? If seeing and doing is good enough for a monkey, why not Dall-E? @danielwcooper investigates https://www.engadget.com/...