/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

MiamiCoin is down ~95% from its peak value in Sept., after the city of Miami promoted it to residents and made millions of dollars from a deal with CityCoins

On Feb. 2, the city of Miami cashed out its cryptocurrency MiamiCoin for the first time, depositing $5.25 million into city coffers.

Quartz

Context & Ripple Effects

MiamiCoin launched in August 2021 as a CityCoins partnership that automatically routed 30% of newly minted coins to Miami, generating $7.1M for the city within weeks. Mayor Francis Suarez leaned in hard, promoting the coin to residents and promising them a bitcoin yield from staking their MiamiCoin.

The unwind is now complete on the city's side: Miami cashed out $5.25 million on Feb. 2, while the token itself sits ~95% below its September peak. By March, Okcoin had suspended trading of both MiamiCoin and NYCCoin over low liquidity, and by May the city had largely moved on from crypto even as it hosted Bitcoin 2023.

First-order effects

  • Miami residents who bought the coin on their mayor's promotion are sitting on ~95% losses, while the city has already banked its $5.25 million — the promised staking yield never materialized into a hedge against the collapse.
  • CityCoins' model takes a direct hit: with Okcoin delisting MiamiCoin and NYCCoin for low liquidity, the protocol's two flagship city tokens have lost their main US trading venue.

Second-order effects

  • Other cities weighing CityCoins-style deals now face the template's full arc — millions raised upfront, then a worthless token and an embarrassed endorsement — making mayors far less willing to put a municipal brand on a coin.
  • Exchanges still listing city coins face the same liquidity-and-reputation calculus Okcoin cited, pressuring remaining venues toward suspension rather than waiting out the decline.

Third-order effects

  • The structural lesson is asymmetric: municipalities can extract real dollars early because they hold the allocation, while retail buyers absorb the downside — a pattern that, if it holds, ends city-branded tokens as a municipal revenue instrument.
  • Mayoral crypto evangelism shifts from civic marketing to political liability, as Suarez's trajectory from most-crypto-friendly US mayor to quietly de-emphasizing crypto illustrates.

The trend: City-branded cryptocurrencies are collapsing as a municipal fundraising model, leaving endorsed retail holders with the losses while governments keep the early gains.