/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

As the EU finalizes DMA and DSA, a report reveals last minute lobbying by Big Tech to shield themselves from crackdowns on surveillance advertising and more

A new report has peeled back the curtain on big tech's frenzied lobbying of European Union lawmakers as they finalize a major series of updates to the bloc's digital rulebook. Source: Corporate Europe Observatory .

TechCrunch Natasha Lomas

Context & Ripple Effects

EU lawmakers had already provisionally agreed the DMA’s core limits on bundling, self-preferencing and restrictions around messaging interoperability when companies shifted from trying to secure major changes to preparing for compliance. The reported push on surveillance advertising shows lobbying continuing at the point where the rules’ final boundaries were being set.

The campaign follows an earlier pattern of intensive EU outreach, including Google’s leading share of meetings with officials as policy attention moved toward antitrust. It matters because the DMA and DSA turn that contest from rule-writing into implementation and enforcement.

First-order effects

  • Big Tech’s last-minute effort puts its preferred treatment of surveillance advertising and other obligations directly before EU lawmakers as the DMA and DSA are finalized.
  • The companies must simultaneously prepare for compliance after their push for substantial DMA revisions failed, rather than rely on a wholesale rewrite of the framework.

Second-order effects

  • DMA obligations on interoperability, bundling and self-preferencing force covered platforms to adjust product and commercial practices, creating more room for services that depend on access to platform users.
  • Lobbying scrutiny raises the political cost for EU institutions of narrowing late-stage protections, making enforcement choices as consequential as the statutory text.

Third-order effects

  • The episode points to EU platform governance becoming a continuing contest over implementation details: rules may be settled in legislation, but firms retain incentives to shape how regulators define and enforce them.
  • Later plans for intensified DMA and DSA enforcement show the policy cycle moving from legislative lobbying toward recurring disputes between EU authorities and the largest technology companies.

The trend: EU digital regulation is shifting from drafting landmark platform rules to sustained battles over compliance, enforcement and the limits of Big Tech influence.

Discussion

  • @vonderleyen Ursula von der Leyen on x
    Today's agreement on #DSA is historic. Our new rules will protect users online, ensure freedom of expression and opportunities for businesses. What is illegal offline will effectively be illegal online in the EU. A strong signal for people, business & countries worldwide.
  • @carnage4life @carnage4life on x
    Tim Cook after getting a notification on his phone about all the changes Apple has to make to the App Store, Messages, FaceTime, Safari, and Siri because the EU passed the Digital Markets Act. https://twitter.com/...
  • @vestager @vestager on x
    Ta da! 16 hours, lots of sweets (but cookies still declined ;) We have a deal on the #DSA: The Digital Services Act will make sure that what is illegal offline is also seen & dealt with as illegal online - not as a slogan, as reality! And always protecting freedom of expression! …
  • @nienkepalstra @nienkepalstra on x
    💥Report reveals the huge industry lobbying force at play to weaken #DSA, including how @Google tried behind the scenes to weaken the ban on surveillance ads based on sensitive data + limit data access for indepedent researchers.
  • @slightlylate Alex Russell on x
    Essential reading. If this language holds, the future is looking bright for the web, competition, and for open computing: https://theplatformlaw.blog/ ... /by @GeradinLaw
  • @dalmaer Dion Almaer on x
    “This is most likely meant to address Apple's policy of requiring all browsers running on iOS to utilize Apple's WebKit browser engine...” https://theplatformlaw.blog/ ...
  • @bertuzluca Luca Bertuzzi on x
    #DSA trilogue: two hours in, there is still no agreement on any point on the agenda, a source told me. Targeted advertising is currently being discussed, but all the previous issues are still open. Brace yourself for a long day.
  • @daphnehk Daphne Keller on x
    The last minute, hushed up changes to the law that are perhaps most alarming for fundamental rights are the ones about mandatory “crisis protocol” content removals under future rules TBD by the Commission. 2/ https://twitter.com/...