/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Obsidian Security, which helps companies secure SaaS apps, raises a $90M Series C led by Menlo Ventures, bringing its total funding to $119.5M

While businesses have embraced software-as-a-service (SaaS) in a massive way, the questions around how to best secure the use of data …

VentureBeat Kyle Alspach

Context & Ripple Effects

Obsidian Security's $90M Series C lands mid-way through a funding race in SaaS security: AppOmni raised a $40M Series B in April 2021 and then a $70M Series C led by Thoma Bravo just two months after Obsidian's round, putting the two rivals at nearly identical total funding ($123M vs. $119.5M). The category's premise — that companies adopting SaaS at scale need dedicated tooling to secure data across those apps — was drawing nine-figure checks from growth investors like Menlo Ventures and Thoma Bravo alike.

What makes this round worth revisiting is where Obsidian went next: four years later it raised an $85M Series D at a $1.1B valuation selling security for AI agents rather than SaaS apps, making this 2022 round the base of a pivot that carried the company past unicorn territory.

First-order effects

  • Obsidian gets $90M from Menlo Ventures to scale its SaaS security platform, directly matching the war chest AppOmni assembled weeks later — both now funded to chase the same enterprise buyers.

Second-order effects

  • With Obsidian and AppOmni each holding ~$120M totals, competition shifts from proving the category to winning accounts on coverage breadth and pricing, pressuring smaller SaaS-security entrants and adjacent data-protection vendors like Odaseva, which raised its own $54M Series C for Salesforce-specific protection.

Third-order effects

  • Obsidian's later Series D shows the structural play: a security vendor built on SaaS app integrations can re-point those integrations at AI agents as enterprise workloads shift, turning the 2022 SaaS-security land grab into distribution for the next attack surface.

The trend: SaaS security specialists are converting deep app-integration footholds into AI-agent security platforms, with venture capital funding the transition ahead of enterprise demand.