/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Apple releases a report it commissioned from Analysis Group, showing that the company's iOS apps “are rarely the most popular app of a particular type”

Apple today shared a new App Store study that it commissioned from economists at Analysis Group, with the report highlighting …

MacRumors Juli Clover

Context & Ripple Effects

Apple's new commissioned study enters a long-running dispute over whether the App Store advantages its own software. A 2019 analysis found Apple's apps leading in more than 60% of test searches, including a highly rated-positioned Podcasts app despite weak user feedback; Apple had also hired economists to defend its commission practices.

The company has previously used Analysis Group research to emphasize the App Store's economic reach. This report instead focuses on category popularity, giving Apple a narrower empirical answer to claims that default platform distribution necessarily translates into category leadership.

First-order effects

  • Apple gains a commissioned data point for contesting claims of broad App Store self-preferencing, directly countering the earlier test-search findings that put Apple apps first in many results.
  • Third-party iOS developers gain Apple-backed evidence that the company's apps are not generally the leading category apps, while the report does not resolve questions about search placement or preinstallation.

Second-order effects

  • Debate over App Store power shifts toward competing measures—category popularity, search ranking, and default use—rather than a single measure of Apple’s advantage.
  • Apple's existing defense of App Store commissions, supported by its economist hiring, is reinforced by a broader argument that the platform faces meaningful app-level competition.

Third-order effects

  • Platform-policy disputes increasingly turn on the metrics chosen to define self-preferencing: popularity data can support Apple while search-result evidence supports critics.
  • If commissioned research becomes a standard part of platform advocacy, regulators and developers will place greater weight on independently reproducible measures of ranking, defaults, and user adoption.

The trend: App-store competition debates are moving from broad allegations of platform advantage toward contested evidence about how distribution, rankings, and user choice interact.

Discussion

  • @mehnitesh2 @mehnitesh2 on x
    @reneritchie Do we buy the dichotomy though? Make it scary to be able to sideload, that's fine. Some small percent of users will go through with it. The majority still get the locked down experience. Or am I wrong, and Billy unlocking his phone for side loads degrades my experien…
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on x
    Interesting Apple lobbying report giving (3rd party estimates for) its market share in music and maps. On iOS. https://www.apple.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @thurrott Paul Thurrott on x
    “Apple releases a report it commissioned from economists showing that its own apps are rarely the most popular app of a particular type in the App Store” Right. That's why you artificially boosted them in search results.
  • @elkmovie Michael Love on x
    “We're not very good at making apps, so you should let us continue to exercise absolute authority over app distribution” https://twitter.com/...
  • @bzamayo Benjamin Mayo on x
    damn maybe keeping the TV app bad was the plan all along https://9to5mac.com/...
  • @chancehmiller Chance Miller on x
    the most honest apple has ever been about TV+ usage [screen capture showing Netflix being 17X bigger than TV+ in the US, Prime Video being 407X times bigger in Japan, etc.]
  • @chancehmiller Chance Miller on x
    Alt headline: Apple says its apps suck, use a third-party instead https://twitter.com/...
  • @skyoptika Dylan on x
    @reneritchie Imagine a world where the App Store has to actually compete for developer attention. Imagine what amazing things will be made available to users now that a whole new class of developers and business models can be offered to them.
  • @reneritchie Rene Ritchie on x
    Some argue the iPhone is so mainstream, data-rich, and critical it has to be an open computing platform. Others, that it's so mainstream, data-rich, and critical, it has to be a locked down console First want everything to be a PC, second want at least one option that's not?
  • @antitrusty Alex Harman on x
    Apple: Everyone loves our walled garden and our amazing products. Also Apple: Our products are trash and no one uses them. https://www.cnet.com/...
  • @reneritchie Rene Ritchie on x
    @Skyoptika They did! We had Nokia, webOS, BlackBerry, Windows, Android, iOS... all with very different policies The “market” collapsed them down to a duopoly...
  • @reneritchie Rene Ritchie on x
    Also, many super popular apps could move outside the App Store, like the Facebook or Google suite, Epic for sure, which could put enormous pressure on people to open side-loading. Console model prevents that timeline on iOS, but you can switch to Android. Choice is a perspective.…
  • @reneritchie Rene Ritchie on x
    I am actually a long-time proponent of Gatekeeper on iOS. I don't think it'll solve for 90% of what fetishists think it will, and it will cause additional burdens for non-nerds But mostly I believe I'm not always right or have every perspective so I like to provoke discussion :) …
  • @outonalumb David Lumb on x
    Apple apps are less popular than third-party apps, according to a report from https://data.ai/ (formerly App Annie), who were contracted by Apple. Still, it comes amid lots of international pressure + laws for fairer App Store practices. https://www.cnet.com/...