Social media platforms are hastily rewriting their rules on hate, violence, and propaganda amid the war on Ukraine, setting precedents that may haunt them later
the ones that govern who can say what online — need a new chapter on geopolitical conflicts. https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ... Will Oremus / @willoremus : Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube have done a surprisingly decent job not both-sidesing Russia/Ukraine. So.... what about the rest of the world? My story today: https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ...
Interesting article, & highlights why governments need to set the rules so that private business is following what legislators want rather than driving agenda. However, often feels like politicians would rather companies made the running rather than being honest about trade offs …
The big US social platforms have been relatively careful in Ukraine about not removing footage that could be evidence of human rights violations. @DiaKayyali would love to see them apply the same nuance in Syria, Sudan, or the Palestinian territories. https://www.washingtonpost.c…
Internet platforms have been scrambling to adapt content policies built around notions of political neutrality to a wartime context... those rule books — the ones that govern who can say what online — need a new chapter on geopolitical conflicts. https://www.washingtonpost.com/ .…
Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube have done a surprisingly decent job not both-sidesing Russia/Ukraine. So.... what about the rest of the world? My story today: https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ...