/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

An inside look at Ukrainian efforts to repel Russian cyberattacks on critical infrastructure, as some worry that early success might be unwound over time

Mehul Srivastava / Financial Times :

Financial Times Mehul Srivastava

Context & Ripple Effects

Ukraine is not a new target: experts flagged years ago that repeated attacks culminating in mass power outages in Kiev were evidence of Russia using the country to test offensive capabilities. When the full-scale invasion came, Washington had already pre-positioned support, embedding US soldiers and cybersecurity experts with Ukrainian defenders before the first missiles flew.

First-order effects

  • Ukrainian grid, government, and logistics operators are holding systems online against sustained Russian intrusion attempts, with foreign specialists working alongside local defenders rather than advising from afar.

Second-order effects

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, critical-infrastructure cyberdefense becomes a standing allied function rather than a purely national one — with Ukraine serving as the live-fire proving ground where that coalition model is built, and where any relaxation of effort would be tested first.

The trend: Wartime cyberdefense is consolidating around a state-plus-private-tech coalition model proven in Ukraine, replacing the era when each country defended its infrastructure alone.

Discussion

  • @chassnews Anne-Sylvaine Chassany on x
    They were trying everything, trying to break in through our website, trying DDoS," said Kharchenko. “It was 24/7.” /// Inside Ukraine's cyber defence: the battle against Moscow's online salvos via @FT ⁦@MehulAtLarge⁩ https://www.ft.com/...
  • @hatr @hatr on x
    In the run-up of Russia's war against Ukraine, one obvious target for cyber-sabotage has been gov-owned power transmission company Ukrenergo. Besides regular break-in attempts apparently a local employee tried to enter premises to run malicious code https://www.ft.com/... https:/…
  • @maxseddon Max Seddon on x
    “The cyber attacks on the IT infrastructure [...] are the most complex cyber operation in history and are one of the first examples of what a real cyber war looks like.” @MehulAtLarge goes inside Ukraine's cyber defenses: https://www.ft.com/...
  • @muradahmed Murad Ahmed on x
    Fascinating inside account of how Ukraine fended off Russian cyber attacks in the first phase of the war. Just like on the ground though, the worry is a more grinding effort will wear down online defences - by @MehulAtLarge in @FT https://www.ft.com/...
  • @muradahmed Murad Ahmed on x
    Includes fascinating details like this - in @FT https://www.ft.com/... https://twitter.com/...