The US Copyright Office rejects a request to grant a copyright to a work of art created by an AI, as the image didn't include an element of “human authorship”
Adi Robertson / The Verge : Source: US Copyright Office .
New ruling that AI art needs “creative input or intervention from a human author” to be copyrightable. How much input? Does Promptism meet this standard? Does cropping, adjusting levels (etc) impact this? Fascinating road ahead! https://www.theverge.com/...
Vu: The most interesting thing I read today. >>> The US Copyright Office says an AI can't copyright its art The US Copyright Office has rejected a request to let an AI copyright a work of art... https://www.theverge.com/... https://twitter.com/...
The US Copyright Office has rejected a request to let an AI copyright a work of art, saying that “the nexus between the human mind and creative expression” is a vital element of copyright. More to play out here in attributing ownership to AI creativity https://www.theverge.com/..…