/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

A look at tech recruitment issues as the US unemployment rate for tech workers is 1.7% and 0.2% for cybersecurity experts, well below 4% for the general economy

Recruiters in tech are desperate for workers.  But candidates are the ones who hold all the power.

New York Times Susan Dominus

Context & Ripple Effects

In early 2022 the US tech labor market was at its tightest on record: tech unemployment of 1.7% and just 0.2% for cybersecurity specialists, against roughly 4% economy-wide, meant recruiters competed for a pool with almost no slack. The demand side kept climbing — Indeed.com showed US developer job postings up 120% on the pre-pandemic baseline by mid-2022 developer job postings up 120% on the pre-pandemic baseline.

That peak now reads as the top of a cycle. Employment in tech occupations hit a record 6.39M in November 2022 even as layoffs began record 6.39M tech employment in November 2022, and by 2025-2026 DOL data shows the market loosening sharply, with IT unemployment falling from 5.5% to 4.5% as postings declined IT unemployment falling from 5.5% to 4.5% and later ticking up to 3.8% amid AI uncertainty IT unemployment rising to 3.8% amid AI uncertainty. The candidate power described here was cyclical, not structural.

First-order effects

  • Tech and cybersecurity candidates could dictate terms in early 2022 — recruiters faced bidding competition for a cybersecurity talent pool that was effectively fully employed at 0.2% unemployment.
  • Employers competing for scarce security and engineering staff absorbed higher compensation costs and slower time-to-hire as the default cost of doing business.

Second-order effects

  • Companies priced out of the talent auction were pushed toward non-wage levers — remote flexibility, faster offers, and poaching from adjacent sectors like banking, retail, health care, and manufacturing, where laid-off tech workers later clustered.
  • The acute cybersecurity shortage gave security specialists outsized leverage, forcing firms to build or buy talent pipelines rather than assume hires would appear.

Third-order effects

  • The subsequent swing — record employment coexisting with layoffs, then unemployment rising toward and past 4% as postings fell — shows tech labor demand is cyclical and sensitive to macro and AI-driven uncertainty, meaning the 2022 candidate's market was a peak, not a permanent regime.
  • Firms that built structural responses to the 2022 shortage (internal training, broader sourcing pools) were better positioned for the looser 2025-2026 market than those that simply outbid rivals.

The trend: Tech labor markets cycle between acute candidate power and employer power, with the 2022 shortage peak giving way to rising unemployment and declining postings by 2025-2026.

Discussion

  • @carnage4life @carnage4life on x
    The unemployment rate for tech workers in the US is 1.7%. It's now a sellers market for techies and tech companies are struggling to hire. U.S. government hostility to immigrants despite Biden win also not helping. Expect more international remote work. https://www.nytimes.com/..…
  • @mkay_fain M. K. Fain on x
    Maybe if tech companies didn't go around firing anyone who writes a moderately spicy Medium post they'd still have workers? Just brainstorming. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @dannygroner Danny Groner on x
    I hate hate hate this messaging. Nobody should feel they are taking a chance, nobody should be asking others to take a chance. Candidates and their advocates should be positioned as experts at whatever level, whatever role. They plug gaps at the company. https://www.nytimes.com/.…
  • @dannydougherty Danny Dougherty on x
    As a person who tweets about stats and has coded in a dozen language I get these (esp. to LinkedIn) & increasingly they feel *actually* targeted to my skills, so it really seems like recruiters are definitely doing more work to match candidates these days https://www.nytimes.com/…
  • @shiraovide Shira Ovide on x
    The life of a tech recruiter in 2022: “Dyba was immediately charmed, if only because — unlike so many tech recruits — he didn't start the conversation by asking, within the first six minutes, what the compensation was.” https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @ryanlawler Ryan Lawler on x
    “If you are not going to offer remote work, if you're not going to offer at least hybrid, we can't help you.” https://www.nytimes.com/...