/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Sources: Goldman Sachs is among a handful of tier-one US banks working on ways to use bitcoin as collateral for cash loans to institutions

Ian Allison / CoinDesk :

CoinDesk Ian Allison

Context & Ripple Effects

Goldman Sachs has been building toward this for years: it set up a cryptocurrency trading desk back in 2017, began trading bitcoin futures with its own money in 2018, then restarted the desk during the 2021 boom and started dealing bitcoin futures alongside Mike Novogratz's Galaxy Digital. Using bitcoin as loan collateral is the natural next rung — moving from trading the asset on clients' behalf to lending against it on Goldman's own book.

The significance is who is doing it: a tier-one US bank treating bitcoin as balance-sheet-grade collateral would pull the asset into mainstream institutional credit, not just trading.

First-order effects

  • Institutional clients gain a way to raise cash without selling their bitcoin holdings, keeping exposure intact while unlocking liquidity — and Goldman's lending service gains a new product line built on its existing crypto desk infrastructure.

Second-order effects

  • Rival tier-one banks face pressure to match the offering or lose institutional crypto business — a pattern that later showed up when JPMorgan moved to let clients worldwide pledge bitcoin and ether as loan collateral.
  • Custody, risk-modeling and margin-infrastructure providers become critical suppliers, since banks can only lend against bitcoin if they can safely hold and mark it.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, bitcoin shifts from a speculative trading asset to accepted bank collateral, embedding crypto directly into traditional credit markets and forcing regulators to define margin and haircut rules for a volatile asset sitting inside bank lending books.

The trend: Wall Street banks are progressing from trading cryptocurrencies to lending against them, turning bitcoin into standard institutional collateral.

Discussion

  • @jeffjohnroberts Jeff Roberts on x
    Democratizing finance with Bitcoin-based “tri-party repo type arrangements” 🙂 https://www.coindesk.com/...
  • @realwillybot @realwillybot on x
    Tetherfication/Ponzification of society https://www.coindesk.com/...
  • @grady_booch Grady Booch on x
    “Banks such as Goldman will not touch cryptocurrency spot markets but lean towards synthetic crypto products such as futures” Or as I call it, “laying the foundation for the next global financial collapse”. https://www.coindesk.com/... https://twitter.com/...