/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

FTC study on the six largest ISPs finds that some fail to fully inform consumers on how their data is monetized, such as using browsing history to serve up ads

Internet service providers fail to disclose to consumers how they use sensitive data, obscure privacy practices and making … Source: Federal Trade Commission .

CyberScoop Tonya Riley

Context & Ripple Effects

This report closes out a probe the FTC began in March 2019, when it ordered seven ISPs — including AT&T and Verizon — to hand over nonpublic information about how they handle consumer data. The findings now published show that some of the six largest providers still fail to fully disclose monetization practices like serving ads off browsing history.

The disclosure gap sits in a regulatory vacuum: telecom operators had already lobbied to stall dozens of state-level bills that would have barred ISPs from selling customer data, so the FTC's study is effectively the main accountability mechanism left standing.

First-order effects

  • AT&T, Verizon and the other ISPs covered by the 2019 FTC inquiry now face documented evidence that their privacy disclosures obscure how browsing data becomes ad inventory, giving the commission a factual basis for follow-on action.
  • The FTC states that any business using personalized pricing must disclose it and says it may deploy enforcement resources or lawsuits against firms that don't — a direct threat aimed at ISPs whose reports were opaque.

Second-order effects

  • ISPs' advertising arms must compete with web platforms under a disclosure standard the carriers themselves helped avoid at the state level, eroding the asymmetry created by the stalled state-privacy legislation.
  • Opaque practices that once drew little scrutiny become audit targets, raising compliance costs for carrier data operations just as the FCC reporting episode showed regulators already distrust ISP self-reporting.

Third-order effects

  • The FTC's playbook here — order nonpublic data, publish gaps, signal enforcement — is the same one it applied to Meta, YouTube and TikTok in its later 'vast surveillance' report, suggesting disclosure of data monetization is becoming a de facto federal baseline in lieu of passed privacy legislation.

The trend: Regulators are substituting FTC disclosure studies for stalled legislative privacy rules, moving from ISPs to social platforms as the subjects.

Discussion

  • @bergmayer John Bergmayer on x
    as an industry, you don't want to see a section titled “Illusory Choices” or “Accountability” in a report on your privacy practices https://www.ftc.gov/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @linakhanftc Lina Khan on x
    The data that internet service providers assemble can enable potentially unlawful discrimination, including digital redlining. While enforcers must be vigilant, there are serious questions around whether persistent tracking creates inherent risks. https://www.ftc.gov/...
  • @internetthought Rudolf van der Berg on x
    US Telcos found to sell customer browsing, real-time location data and data on ethnicity, race, sexuality, religion, income, political affiliation. Have as much or more data than US big tech firms! https://www.ftc.gov/...
  • @linakhanftc Lina Khan on x
    At our open meeting today, staff presented a study on the privacy practices of major internet service providers, detailing how these firms often surveil users, aggregate data across a staggering array of services, and deprive users of meaningful choice. https://www.ftc.gov/...
  • @ethanbaron @ethanbaron on x
    FTC report on what your internet provider is doing with your personal information: ‘subscribers’ real-time location data .. was being accessed by car salesmen, property managers, bail bondsmen, bounty hunters, and others without reasonable protections' https://www.ftc.gov/...
  • @jeffstone500 Jeff Stone on x
    We spend a lot of time worrying about the way Big Tech betrays user privacy, but the FTC just dropped a 2-year investigation into how ISPs: + access raw internet traffic + use sensitive data for ads + obscure privacy practices more via @TonyaJoRiley —> https://www.cyberscoop.com/…
  • @rycrist Ry Crist on x
    NEW: A report issued Thursday from the Federal Trade Commission claims that internet providers including AT&T, Charter Spectrum, Comcast Xfinity, Google Fiber, T-Mobile, and Verizon are collecting far more data than consumers realize. Details: https://www.cnet.com/... (via @CNET)
  • @senblumenthal Richard Blumenthal on x
    Broadband firms monitoring our web browsing. Cell phone providers selling location data to advertisers. This new @FTC report is an urgent call for strict rules & strong enforcement to protect against broadband companies' spying. https://twitter.com/...
  • @senmarkey Ed Markey on x
    It's not just Big Tech gobbling up troves of sensitive information about us. The broadband behemoths are tracking our every move online too. It's unacceptable that if you're over the age of 12 in this country, you have ZERO privacy rights online. Congress must act. https://twitte…