Coinbase says SEC threatened to sue over its yet-to-be-launched Lend program, following discussions with them for almost six months

Crypto exchange Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong responded Tuesday evening to planned enforcement by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining … Source: The Coinbase Blog .

The Block 2021-09-08 Frank Chaparro

Context & Ripple Effects

The Lend dispute marks an early break between Coinbase and the SEC after months of discussions. The immediate product fight was followed by Coinbase tabling the interest-paying lending product under regulatory pressure.

Later coverage shows the disagreement broadening from Lend to Coinbase’s account of an SEC demand to halt trading in all crypto except bitcoin, and then to fights over the agency’s regulatory approach and records.

First-order effects

Coinbase’s planned Lend launch is placed under an immediate enforcement threat, forcing the exchange to weigh launch risk against abandoning or redesigning the product.
The SEC’s stance turns a private pre-launch discussion into a public dispute over how the agency applies securities law to Coinbase’s crypto products.

Second-order effects

The subsequent decision to table Lend removes a prospective interest-bearing product from Coinbase’s near-term offering and makes regulatory clearance a gating issue for similar launches.
Coinbase’s later public responses to an SEC Wells notice and its account of the trading demand indicate that the Lend confrontation helped establish a more adversarial relationship between the exchange and regulator.

Third-order effects

The sequence points toward crypto-product oversight being determined increasingly through enforcement threats and litigation rather than pre-launch regulatory alignment, as reflected in Coinbase’s later FOIA lawsuits seeking the SEC’s views.
For large exchanges, product strategy becomes more tightly coupled to legal interpretation and disclosure disputes with the SEC, rather than solely to customer demand or technical execution.

The trend: US crypto oversight is shifting from behind-the-scenes engagement toward public enforcement and legal battles over the SEC’s interpretation of digital-asset products.

Discussion

@brian_armstrong Brian Armstrong on x
1/ Some really sketchy behavior coming out of the SEC recently. Story time...
@brian_armstrong Brian Armstrong on x
5/ They responded by telling us this lend feature is a security. Ok - seems strange, how can lending be a security? So we ask the SEC to help us understand and share their view. We always make an effort to work proactively with regulators, and keep an open mind.
@coinbase @coinbase on x
After months of trying to engage with the @SECGov on our planned Coinbase Lend product, we recently received notice that it intends to pursue legal action against us. We believe dialogue is at the heart of good regulation, even if the SEC may not. https://blog.coinbase.com/...
@john_hempton @john_hempton on x
@brian_armstrong Seriously are you an idiot. Try the FIRST PAGE of The Securities Act of 1933. https://twitter.com/...
@brian_armstrong Brian Armstrong on x
6/ They refuse to tell us why they think it's a security, and instead subpoena a bunch of records from us (we comply), demand testimony from our employees (we comply), and then tell us they will be suing us if we proceed to launch, with zero explanation as to why.
@econoar Eric.Eth on x
The most interesting thing about the SEC going after Coinbase and Uniswap is I'm not sure they've ever dealt with ANYTHING like the united crypto community. Typically they go after someone or some company that may have a few vocal supporters. Good luck...
@bgarlinghouse Brad Garlinghouse on x
https://twitter.com/... https://twitter.com/...
@brian_armstrong Brian Armstrong on x
20/ If we end up in court we may finally get the regulatory clarity the SEC refuses to provide. But regulation by litigation should be the last resort for the SEC, not the first.
@mcuban Mark Cuban on x
@brian_armstrong Brian, this is “Regulation via Litigation”. They aren't capable of working through this themselves and are afraid of making mistakes in doing so. They they leave it to the lawyers. Just the people you don't want impacting the new technologies. You have to go on t…
@ldrogen LeighDrogen.eth on x
Here's what's really going on with the SEC and Coinbase Gensler is desperate to prevent a mainstream financial application from integrating a yield product with decent UX for mass adoption because he knows that's the killer app that on boards everyone to Crypto
@prestonjbyrne Preston Byrne on x
“Yield” products are securities. They differ in no material respect from an unsecured bond. They just don't use the name. Other countries, like England, have debt crowdfunding rules. US cos should check that out and we should emulate those rules here. https://twitter.com/...
@twobitidiot Ryan Selkis on x
1/ The SEC isn't protecting investors, or promoting fair, efficient, & safe domestic crypto markets with their intimidation tactics. Their approach has been so poor it's indistinguishable from an active effort to *hurt* American retail investors, which looks increasingly likely. …
@joemccann @joemccann on x
Regulatory capture 101. Banks don't want this type of lending because the rates are higher than they can offer. SEC protects the banks (Dodd-Frank Act handed the banks the keys to the castle). It's a pity. https://twitter.com/...
@brian_armstrong Brian Armstrong on x
21/ Our door remains open. Hopefully the SEC steps up to create the clarity this industry deserves, without harming consumers and companies in the process. America could really use us all working together to figure this out right now.
@brian_armstrong Brian Armstrong on x
8/ But in this case they are refusing to offer any opinion in writing to the industry on what should be allowed and why, and instead are engaging in intimidation tactics behind closed doors. Whatever their theory is here, it feels like a reach/land grab vs other regulators.
@brian_armstrong Brian Armstrong on x
2/ Millions of crypto holders have been earning yield on their assets over the last few years. It makes sense, if you want to lend out your funds, you can earn a return. Everyone seems happy.
@milwaukeebonds Will Slaughter on x
When fintech arrogance collides with staggering ignorance of over a century's worth of securities & banking laws, epic stupidity supernovas like this thread are the result: https://twitter.com/...
@johnedeaton1 John E Deaton on x
Not true. But when you carefully read the Complaint filed against both #Ripple and #XRP by the SEC and you ignore the irrelevant noise contained therein (which is meant to distract and divide the crypto community), you see the true and dangerous intentions of the SEC.
@econoar Eric.Eth on x
So glad that Brian is putting this shady behavior by the SEC in the spotlight. As a US citizen, I'll do all I personally can to vote against anyone that supports this type of behavior. https://twitter.com/...
@faryarshirzad Faryar Shirzad on x
Crypto and digital assets markets need clear and sensible regulations. There's broad consensus on the need for Congress to take up this important area of policy, and we at @coinbase look forward to contributing to that effort. https://twitter.com/...
@johnedeaton1 John E Deaton on x
@GaryGensler in his letter to @ewarren and in his recent public remarks makes clear that he is coming after exchanges and #DeFi next. Brian's tweet proves it. It's time the community ends the bullshit tribalism and organizes an entity designed not only to fight back, but win. htt…
@fintechfrank Frank Chaparro on x
Wow big crypto regulatory development Brian Armstrong responds to SEC subpoena, threats to shut down Coinbase yield product https://www.theblockcrypto.com/ ...
@jungleincxrp @jungleincxrp on x
😆 and now maybe u see why when one is attacked we all are under attack. #relistxrp and together we will fight this https://twitter.com/...
@pinboard @pinboard on x
Cryptocurrency is basically the sovereign citizen movement for money, which is why it's so important not to lend it legitimacy. The SEC's manifest desire to fire it all into the Sun is gratifying if overdue
@machiavellecon Neil Smith on x
Everyone has been discussing the Howey Test for months/years. It needs to be tested for ‘crypto deposits’. It's not ‘zero explanation’. This is how it works. https://twitter.com/...
@erikvoorhees Erik Voorhees on x
“But once again, we got no explanation from the SEC. Instead, they opened a formal investigation.” Thank you @coinbase for opening up about this. Most companies wouldn't. https://twitter.com/...
@adamsamson Adam Samson on x
This SEC intervention could potentially have wide-ranging implications for crypto/DeFi. Yield products are an absolutely huge business & if they are considered securities, it would obv really raise the bar on issuing them. (Story by @MsHannahMurphy) https://twitter.com/...
@ricardobsalinas Ricardo Salinas Pliego on x
It reminds me of a famous quote : “ We are from the government and we are here to help you ”. Lovely kind of people. https://twitter.com/...
@crypto_chase Crypto Chase on x
Imagine thinking the SEC is gonna let one of the only legitimate exchanges (actual USD on/off ramp) offer 4% yield. You have to put your money in the hands of their banker friends for 0.2% APY like every other pleb. https://twitter.com/...
@fordm Matt Ford on x
In this thread, the CEO of Coinbase criticizes the SEC for not explaining to them why lending an asset for yield is a security. https://twitter.com/...
@carnage4life Dare Obasanjo on x
CEO of Coinbase calls out the SEC for blocking them from shipping features using selectively enforced rules. Going public against a regulator is a risky approach but given how hostile regulators are to tech all over the world, not much left to lose by getting public on their side…
@brian_armstrong Brian Armstrong on x
13/ Shutting these down would arguably be harming consumers more than protecting them, and by preventing Coinbase from launching the same thing that other companies already have live, they're creating an unfair market.
@sirrobartii1 @sirrobartii1 on x
I'd feel bad for you, but then I remember how you delisted #XRP and partook in the process of dumping it 80%. I feel bad for the hundreds of thousands of investors instead, fren.🤝 https://twitter.com/...
@twobitidiot Ryan Selkis on x
This is state behavior I would expect from the CCP, not the American financial regulators, tbh. cc: @SenLummis @tedcruz @SenToomey this is truly unbelievable and it would be good to have some answers from the SEC. https://twitter.com/...
@matthlamers Matt Lamers on x
the CEO of coinbase asking the SEC ‘how lending can be a security?’ is just deeply funny https://twitter.com/...
@fintechfrank Frank Chaparro on x
Here's a blog from Paul Grewal, chief legal officer at Coinbase. The SEC has told us it wants to sue us over Lend. We don't know why. https://blog.coinbase.com/...
@man_growth GrowthStockGuru on x
SEC looking into how $COIN can offer a double digit yield on its $USDC offerings. The obviously juicy return is operating in murky regulatory waters. $VMNT is launching its yield generating stablecoin $USDV with compliance in mind. Soon everyone will know about it https://twitter…
@novogratz Mike Novogratz on x
I hope @GaryGensler responds. I have known him to be a straight shooter. Let's see. Thanks for the update @brian_armstrong. https://twitter.com/...
@brian_armstrong Brian Armstrong on x
11/ If you don't want this activity, then simply publish your position, in writing, and enforce it evenly across the industry.
@quantian1 Quantian on x
Remember when Robinhood tried to turn their SIPC protection into an unregulated checking account before someone immediately called them to say “knock it off, dipshit”? That's basically this, but with a significantly dumber management picking up the phone
@prestonpysh Preston Pysh on x
Uh oh. Looks like Gensler, is making a play against interest bearing coins (PoS staking - which may be crypto asset securities), and Coinbase is the prime candidate for establishing the precedence. Brian appears to be publicly proclaiming differential treatment against Coinbase. …
@laurashin Laura Shin on x
👀 I feel the positive sentiment from earlier this year about Gensler helming the SEC has shifted ... https://twitter.com/...
@bondhack Robert Smith on x
CEO of a $50bn company hasn't heard of the bond market https://twitter.com/...
@brian_armstrong Brian Armstrong on x
4/ We were planning to go live in a few weeks, so we reached out to the SEC to give them a friendly heads up and briefing https://blog.coinbase.com/...
@pinboard @pinboard on x
This thread about how the SEC is being mean to the company trying to hook cryptocurrency scams into the real economy creates an acute crisis for nanoluthiers, who are still decades away from being able to build an atomic scale violin and thought they had more time https://twitter…
@thestalwart Joe Weisenthal on x
This isn't about sympathy with $COIN per se. But new lending products, built by anonymous teams, are being spun up every day. They're a little different than something like Lend, but it still creates essentially two different tracks, with one being at a major disadvantage.
@brian_armstrong Brian Armstrong on x
17/ We've always tried to be good actors in the space - leaning in to sensible regulation even when it is difficult or expensive. We try to think about what products we would want for ourselves, and what risks we would want our families to be aware of, before launching products.
@mattparlmer @mattparlmer on x
It is an extremely good development that more people are coming forward with complaints about extralegal pressure emanating from USG https://twitter.com/...
@brian_armstrong Brian Armstrong on x
9/ Meanwhile, plenty of other crypto companies continue to offer a lend feature, but Coinbase is somehow not allowed to.
@thestalwart Joe Weisenthal on x
This seems like the general problem with the state of crypto regulation right now. Any company that tries to make a point of being a good player automatically falls behind https://blog.coinbase.com/... https://twitter.com/...
@birdyword Mike Bird on x
Me on my first day of financial journalism out of university 🤝 The CEO of a $56bn company Not understanding securities https://twitter.com/...
@quantian1 Quantian on x
The entire point of having a regulatory apparatus- as distinct from a legal one- is so someone can say “Yeah, absolutely do not do that specific thing you think is very clever, I'll come up with a general reason why not after I think of it”. https://twitter.com/...
@decryptmedia Decrypt on x
The SEC warned it will sue Coinbase over a planned high yield crypto savings product. The company's CEO lashed out on Twitter https://decrypt.co/... https://twitter.com/...
@_danielsinclair Daniel Sinclair on x
Armstrong is really good at these types of comms. He brings issues into the open, rather than solely pumping money into traditional lobby groups behind closed doors. Will the SEC cave? I don't know! But Coinbase will own the public perception. https://twitter.com/...
@nycsouthpaw Southpaw on x
*angrily demanding someone at the SEC personally invite me to google the term “bonds"* https://twitter.com/...

Chronicles