/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Amazon ends use of arbitration for customer disputes, which critics said put consumers at a huge disadvantage; disputes can now be pursued in federal court

Michael Corkery / New York Times : Tweets: @ddayen , @gregbensinger , @seattletimes , @shatter242 , @tdlenk , @bettermarkets , and @shiraovide Tweets: David Dayen / @ddayen : The arbitration storm strikes again, as Amazon drops the clause for consumer purchases. Importantly, however, arbitration remains in place AFAICT for the millions of 3rd-party sellers the company partners with. https://www.nytimes.com/... @gregbensinger : Mandatory arbitration remains the chief means for cos to have lawsuits go away quietly & not have to change the underlying behavior/problem. It's not really about the customer. Then Amazon was hit with 75,000 arbitration claims and flipped: @mcorkery5 https://www.nytimes.com/... @seattletimes : Amazon changed its approach to disputes after lawyers for consumers hit the company with roughly 75,000 arbitration claims alleging that devices featuring the voice-operated assistant Alexa were recording customers without their consent. https://www.seattletimes.com/ ... @shatter242 : @Techmeme @mcorkery5 After the recent walmart lawsuit they now know that the most they can be liable for is $300,000. That's nothing to them. They made that and more while I was typing this tweet. Travis Lenkner / @tdlenk : “Arbitration was always part of an effort to evade liability, not just to escape class actions,” said Travis Lenkner, a lawyer at the firm Keller Lenkner. Amazon “is the first company to turn tail. Others may well do so.” https://www.nytimes.com/... @bettermarkets : A first step in the right direction is a hopeful step. Like @amazon decision to end forced arbitration of customer disputes. But eliminating the jury trial waiver and not forcing plaintiffs to travel to Washington state to seek justice are key next steps. https://bettermarkets.com/... Shira Ovide / @shiraovide : Companies wanted unhappy customers to go to arbitration instead of suing. Arbitration isn't worth the hassle. Companies evaded liability. Lawyers figured out how to mass-produce arbitration claims. Companies say, OK FINE. SUE US. By @mcorkery5 https://t.co/PYusMfrwb1

New York Times Michael Corkery

Discussion

  • @ddayen David Dayen on x
    The arbitration storm strikes again, as Amazon drops the clause for consumer purchases. Importantly, however, arbitration remains in place AFAICT for the millions of 3rd-party sellers the company partners with. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @gregbensinger @gregbensinger on x
    Mandatory arbitration remains the chief means for cos to have lawsuits go away quietly & not have to change the underlying behavior/problem. It's not really about the customer. Then Amazon was hit with 75,000 arbitration claims and flipped: @mcorkery5 https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @seattletimes @seattletimes on x
    Amazon changed its approach to disputes after lawyers for consumers hit the company with roughly 75,000 arbitration claims alleging that devices featuring the voice-operated assistant Alexa were recording customers without their consent. https://www.seattletimes.com/ ...
  • @shatter242 @shatter242 on x
    @Techmeme @mcorkery5 After the recent walmart lawsuit they now know that the most they can be liable for is $300,000. That's nothing to them. They made that and more while I was typing this tweet.
  • @tdlenk Travis Lenkner on x
    “Arbitration was always part of an effort to evade liability, not just to escape class actions,” said Travis Lenkner, a lawyer at the firm Keller Lenkner. Amazon “is the first company to turn tail. Others may well do so.” https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @bettermarkets @bettermarkets on x
    A first step in the right direction is a hopeful step. Like @amazon decision to end forced arbitration of customer disputes. But eliminating the jury trial waiver and not forcing plaintiffs to travel to Washington state to seek justice are key next steps. https://bettermarkets.co…
  • @shiraovide Shira Ovide on x
    Companies wanted unhappy customers to go to arbitration instead of suing. Arbitration isn't worth the hassle. Companies evaded liability. Lawyers figured out how to mass-produce arbitration claims. Companies say, OK FINE. SUE US. By @mcorkery5 https://t.co/PYusMfrwb1