/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Data on 700M LinkedIn users for sale on a forum, with info like names, addresses, inferred salary; LinkedIn says it seems some of the data is from other sources

Madeleine Hodson / PrivacySharks :

PrivacySharks Madeleine Hodson

Context & Ripple Effects

The listing follows an earlier sale offer involving scraped LinkedIn profile data, which LinkedIn said consisted of publicly viewable information. The new dataset is more consequential because it is presented with attributes such as addresses and inferred salary, while LinkedIn says at least some material appears to have been assembled from outside sources.

The distinction between a platform scrape and a compiled dossier matters: public professional-profile data can be combined with third-party information into a more actionable commercial or fraud-targeting dataset without all of it originating at LinkedIn.

First-order effects

  • LinkedIn must respond to a sale offer tied to 700M of its users while clarifying which fields originated on its service and which came from other sources.
  • Affected members face a broader exposure than a single-profile scrape when profile identifiers are offered alongside addresses and inferred compensation data.

Second-order effects

  • Data brokers and scrapers gain an incentive to enrich publicly visible professional data with external records, making source-by-source attribution harder for platforms and users.
  • LinkedIn's trust burden shifts from protecting account credentials, as in the earlier 2012 credential dataset sale, to limiting the reuse and enrichment of information visible across the web.

Third-order effects

  • The episode points to a widening public-data permission boundary: information that is individually visible can become materially more sensitive when compiled, scored, and sold at population scale.
  • If profile-data sales continue to rely on mixed sources, platform enforcement will increasingly turn on provenance and downstream use rather than a simple question of whether a field was public.

The trend: Professional-network data is becoming a feedstock for enriched identity datasets, sharpening the divide between public visibility and permission to aggregate and resell.

Discussion

  • @troyhunt Troy Hunt on x
    This looks like a continuation of the story earlier this year which wasn't a breach, rather it was scraped. Newsworthy, but big difference https://9to5mac.com/...
  • @jaycuthrell Jay Cuthrell on x
    For sale or “on sale with deepening discounts”?📉 Will similar online community users corpora see significant discounts due to aging?⌛️ Will the recent certiorari outcomes re: LinkedIn v. hiQ that may pave the way for cheaper and newer third party scraping endeavors?🤔 https://twit…
  • @benlovejoy @benlovejoy on x
    Pro tip: If someone is able to scrape [hundreds of] millions of records from your service without being detected, that is indeed a data breach ... https://twitter.com/...
  • @blueboxdave David Marcus on x
    Hackers scored a veritable treasure trove of unopened invitation to link emails. https://9to5mac.com/...
  • @jgamblin Jerry Gamblin on x
    “The hacker appears to have misused the official LinkedIn API to download the data.” < We weren't hacked, we we were misused. https://9to5mac.com/...
  • @can @can on x
    Data is a Liability https://twitter.com/...
  • @ambermac Amber Mac on x
    “A 2nd massive LinkedIn breach reportedly exposes the data of 700M users, which is more than 92% of the total 756M users. The database is for sale on the dark web, with records incl phone numbers, physical addresses, geolocation data, & inferred salaries.” https://9to5mac.com/...
  • @benlovejoy @benlovejoy on x
    Follows a breach of 500M users back in April, and appears to have used the same method ... https://twitter.com/...