/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Crypto asset manager Babel Finance raises $40M Series A from Zoo Capital, Sequoia Capital China, Tiger Global, and others

Three years after its inception, crypto financial service provider Babel Finance is racking up fundings and partnerships from major institutional investors.

TechCrunch Rita Liao

Context & Ripple Effects

In mid-2021, Hong Kong's crypto-lending cohort was on a funding tear: weeks after this $40M Series A, Babel Finance followed with an $80M Series B at a $2B valuation, while local rival Amber Group raised a $100M Series B at a $1B valuation in June. The investor list — Zoo Capital, Sequoia Capital China, and Tiger Global — put crossover money behind a balance-sheet business that lends against and manages customer crypto.

The round now reads as the front end of a documented arc: barely a year after the Series B, a [[a:981319|July 2022 proposal deck seeking rescue funding showed Babel had lost 8K BTC and 56K ETH, worth $280M+, proprietary-trading customer funds]].

First-order effects

  • Babel gains the institutional capital to scale lending and asset-management books built on customer deposits, with Tiger Global's participation signaling crossover funds treating crypto credit as a mainstream private-market allocation.

Second-order effects

  • Rival Amber Group's near-simultaneous $100M raise shows the same investors underwriting competing Hong Kong crypto-balance-sheet startups, pushing the cohort toward aggressive yield offerings to justify unicorn valuations.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds — and Babel's own rescue deck suggests it did — deposit-funded prop trading becomes the failure mode of this entire category, and backers like Tiger Global, whose COVID-era pace fueled a wave of fast unicorns later marked down sharply (Superhuman cut 45%, DuckDuckGo 72% by September 2023), absorb write-downs across the board.

The trend: 2021's crossover-funded crypto lending platforms scaled customer deposits into proprietary risk until the market turn exposed the model, forcing rescues, restructurings, and investor write-downs.