/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Timescale, which develops the open source TimescaleDB time series database, raises $40M Series B led by Redpoint Ventures, bringing its total raised to ~$70M

Timescale, makers of the open source TimescaleDB time series database, announced a $40 million Series B financing round today.

TechCrunch Ron Miller

Context & Ripple Effects

This $40M Series B is the middle beat in Timescale's funding arc: after a $15M Series A1 in early 2019 built on its pitch of easy cloud deployment for time-series workloads, the Redpoint-led round funds the push to turn the open-source TimescaleDB community into paying cloud customers.

It also lands in a crowded lane — InfluxData had already out-raised the category with a $60M Series D on top of its earlier SAP-backed Series C, and Materialize's Kleiner Perkins-led streaming SQL round in late 2020 showed investors extending the same bet to real-time data. The round worked: within ten months Tiger Global took Timescale through a $110M Series C at a $1B+ valuation.

First-order effects

  • Timescale gains roughly two years of additional runway to convert open-source TimescaleDB adoption into revenue, directly contesting the developer base InfluxData has courted since its own large rounds.

Second-order effects

  • InfluxData, which raised bigger totals earlier, faces a rival matching its capital intensity while offering SQL compatibility — pressuring both vendors to compete on managed-cloud pricing and migration ease rather than raw feature checklists.

Third-order effects

  • The pattern across Timescale, InfluxData, and Materialize points toward time-series and streaming data infrastructure consolidating around venture-funded companies whose business is hosting their own open-source cores, squeezing out self-managed deployments over time.

The trend: Capital is concentrating behind open-source time-series and streaming databases as they race each other into managed cloud services.