Under intense pressure from China, Ant Group will become a financial holding company that is regulated more like a bank, among other changes
- Chinese regulators summoned Ant for meeting on April 12 — Ant to fold all financial operations into holding firm
BloombergLulu Yilun Chen
Context & Ripple Effects
China's central bank had already ordered Ant to overhaul its lending, insurance, and wealth-management businesses and provide a timetable in its initial overhaul order. Reports then shifted from a proposed holding-company structure to a regulator-backed agreement subject to bank capital requirements.
The April meeting turns that regulatory trajectory into an immediate organizational mandate: Ant's financial operations are to sit inside a single, bank-like regulated entity.
First-order effects
Ant must fold its financial operations into a holding company, changing the legal and supervisory perimeter for its lending, insurance, and wealth-management businesses.
Chinese regulators gain a consolidated entity through which to apply bank-like regulation to Ant's financial operations.
Second-order effects
The earlier overhaul of Ant's lending, insurance, and wealth-management units is now tied to a single holding-company structure, rather than separate business-level remediation.
Bank capital requirements attached to the structure make Ant's financial expansion subject to constraints associated with the new regulated perimeter.
Third-order effects
Ant's case establishes a model in which a large platform's financial businesses are brought under consolidated, bank-style oversight rather than governed solely as platform services.
The trend: China is moving Ant's financial activities toward consolidated, bank-style oversight under direct regulatory control.
The directive follows an intense regulatory assault on Mr. Ma's business empire that began with the suspension of the company's blockbuster initial public offering in November https://www.wsj.com/...
To be clear, Alibaba *is* aware of a protracted SEC investigation because they keep disclosing it - Just as they have for nearly 5 years, but with no update. None. But sure, let's pretend all $BABA's regulatory / law enforcement problems are behind it now. https://twitter.com/...
1. Munger rips into Jack Ma at $DJCO annual meeting. 2. Munger buys shares in Jack's Company, $BABA 3. $BABA gets fined $2.8B, likely a CCP retaliation towards Jack. https://www.nytimes.com/...
Since antitrust and competition law is all the rage right now, just thought I'd point out that China - China! - is levelling billions in antitrust fines on its own companies. https://www.nytimes.com/...
Alibaba's record fine in context. $2.8 billion is large but not large enough to cause a significant dent on the company's financial situation. Check out size and scope below. https://twitter.com/...
Will China, EU, or US be the first to rein in its tech giants? Our @ft analysis of the antitrust issues facing China after yday's record fine. While some firms are practising “pre-emptive compliance”, one official said he expected gestures of obedience. https://www.ft.com/...