/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Max Schrems' non-profit Noyb files a complaint with the French privacy watchdog, claims Google's Android Advertising Identifier violates EU's ePrivacy Directive

Our mission to make business better is fueled by readers like you.  To enjoy unlimited access to our journalism, subscribe today.

Fortune David Meyer

Context & Ripple Effects

Noyb had already challenged Google’s Android Ad ID under GDPR in a 2020 Austrian complaint, and later targeted Apple’s IDFA with complaints to German and Spanish regulators. The French filing extends that identifier-focused campaign to the ePrivacy Directive and another national watchdog.

The sequence puts Google and Apple’s advertising identifiers under related but distinct legal theories, shifting Noyb’s challenge from a single company complaint toward a broader test of mobile tracking consent.

First-order effects

  • Google’s Android Advertising Identifier is now subject to a French privacy-watchdog complaint alleging a breach of the EU ePrivacy Directive.
  • Noyb adds a French enforcement route to its earlier Android Ad ID GDPR challenge, increasing the regulatory burden around Google’s mobile advertising identifier.

Second-order effects

  • Advertisers and app-based ad-tech firms that rely on Android identifiers face greater uncertainty over whether the identifier can be used without the consent standard Noyb is seeking to enforce.
  • Apple’s IDFA becomes a closer comparator after Noyb’s German and Spanish complaints over advertiser tracking, making platform-specific identifier policies a shared regulatory issue.

Third-order effects

  • If national watchdogs accept Noyb’s theory, mobile advertising identifiers may increasingly be governed as consent-sensitive tracking tools rather than routine device settings, constraining platform control over ad measurement.
  • The pattern favors privacy enforcement that tests the same tracking practice across several regulators and legal regimes, rather than resolving it through a single complaint.

The trend: European privacy advocacy is broadening from challenges to individual platforms into coordinated scrutiny of the mobile identifiers that underpin ad tracking.

Discussion

  • @robertjbateman Robert Bateman on x
    Another pretty rock-solid-looking complaint from @NOYBeu. The case states that Google installs its ad ID on every Android phone without consent. It's impossible to delete it (without immediately getting a new one). This allegedly violates ePriv Dir. /1 https://noyb.eu/...
  • @valentinapop Valentina Pop on x
    After successfully having challenged Facebook's data gathering practices in EU courts, Max Schrems starts another case, this time accusing Google of illegally tracking Android users via @FT ⁦@JavierespFT⁩ https://www.ft.com/...
  • @noybeu Noyb on x
    📢 Complaint filed: Google's software creates the AAID without the user's knowledge or consent. After its creation, Google and third parties can access the AAID to track users' behaviour, study consumption preferences and provide personalised advertising. https://noyb.eu/... https…
  • @privacymatters @privacymatters on x
    @NOYBeu “has filed a complaint against Google in France alleging that the US tech giant is illegally tracking users on Android phones without their consent” https://www.ft.com/... It involves Google's AAID (Android Advertising Identifier) https://noyb.eu/...
  • @maxschrems Max Schrems on x
    We (@NOYBeu) filed a #GDPR complaint with the French @CNIL over Google's use of the Android Advertisement Identifier — basically a permanent smartphone cookie that users neither consented to nor have an option to opt-out from.. 🤨 https://noyb.eu/...