/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Q&A with mobile marketing analyst Eric Seufert on the Facebook-Apple conflict, Apple's real motives for iOS privacy changes, and potential harm to businesses

I've given up, it just looks like a poisoned equilibrium to me Tom Lee / @tjl : The other piece that feels like it needs development is the lamentation about removing a tool small businesses can use to compete. I am sure there are examples! But if you allow yourself even a little paternalism you can admit that IAP games are bad for people and gaming itself. Matthew Yglesias / @mattyglesias : @tjl Untargeted ads are way better! Keith Petri / @keithepetri : Nothing comes close to the clarity this interview provides on the nuanced implications of $APPL, $GOOG and $FB's recent shifts in policies on cookies, MAIDs, attribution, and more. 👏 @eric_seufert https://twitter.com/... Eric Seufert / @eric_seufert : In an alternate universe...(1/X) https://twitter.com/...

Stratechery Ben Thompson

Discussion

  • @eric_seufert Eric Seufert on x
    I spoke with @benthompson from @stratechery two days ago about ATT, Apple vs. Facebook, and the mechanics of user-centric advertising. I enjoyed our conversation immensely, and Ben has graciously made this interview free-to-share https://stratechery.com/...
  • @mrahmey Maurice Rahmey on x
    This was an excellent must read interview on the impact Apple's privacy updates will have on the ad ecosystem. https://twitter.com/...
  • @eric_seufert Eric Seufert on x
    6/ I simply see no way that Google could not expose the ATT prompt. It's unthinkable that they'd remove all data collection mechanisms from their apps, or even walk away from opted-in data.
  • @richlightshed Rich Greenfield on x
    $SNAP Jeremi Gorman says @snapchat admires Apple's focus to protect consumer privacy Says Snap has been working hard with Apple to utilize alternatives post IDFA including building own systems leveraging first-party data Snap is clearly not worried https://twitter.com/...
  • @id_aa_carmack John Carmack on x
    This is a really good interview, with some insight into the machinery that led to the billion dollar mobile games. https://twitter.com/...
  • @palmerluckey Palmer Luckey on x
    Apple is well positioned to launch unbeatable OS-level or hardware-level adblocking tools for all their customers. It would be one of the most disruptive moves of all time.
  • @eric_seufert Eric Seufert on x
    5/ My belief is that Google's original comms were incorrect / mis-stated and they *will* expose the prompt. Google admits as much in this webinar they published Feb 2: they'll model conversion data from “users who consent to ATT” https://www.youtube.com/...
  • @tjl Tom Lee on x
    particularly fascinating Stratechery today, about Apple's coming changes to the ad landscape https://stratechery.com/... but some real head-scratchers in here, too. do people really prefer targeted mobile ads to TV ads? (they hate ads in general, of course) https://twitter.com/..…
  • @modestproposal1 Modest Proposal on x
    This is a very good interview. You may agree in principle with notions of greater privacy, but it's interesting to try and understand what Apple is doing, how self serving it appears to be, and what the ramifications are beyond a pissing match with Facebook. https://twitter.com/.…
  • @damianburns Damian Burns on x
    'I think Apple underestimates the degree to which Apple's growth in services revenue and the growth in the App Store is because of Facebook' Excellent interview with mobile marketing expert @eric_seufert via @stratechery https://stratechery.com/...
  • @jrichlive @jrichlive on x
    @sethjberman @modestproposal1 The PR and messaging by 🍎 has been ninja level. Very few people understand the implications.
  • @modestproposal1 Modest Proposal on x
    This point on the impact on DTC brands and potentially Shopify is interesting. But also, something Ben had written about before, which is that this is just going to drive Facebook, and users, towards shopping on Facebook/instagram. https://twitter.com/...
  • @eric_seufert Eric Seufert on x
    2/ This kind of wording isn't actually foreign to iOS https://twitter.com/...
  • @tjl Tom Lee on x
    Ditto dropshippers, algorithmically generated t-shirts, lasercut knicknacks, and much of the rest of it. I sort of admire those who stand back from this and earnestly say “if people want it, it's great!”—I've given up, it just looks like a poisoned equilibrium to me
  • @tjl Tom Lee on x
    The other piece that feels like it needs development is the lamentation about removing a tool small businesses can use to compete. I am sure there are examples! But if you allow yourself even a little paternalism you can admit that IAP games are bad for people and gaming itself.
  • @mattyglesias Matthew Yglesias on x
    @tjl Untargeted ads are way better!
  • @keithepetri Keith Petri on x
    Nothing comes close to the clarity this interview provides on the nuanced implications of $APPL, $GOOG and $FB's recent shifts in policies on cookies, MAIDs, attribution, and more. 👏 @eric_seufert https://twitter.com/...
  • @eric_seufert Eric Seufert on x
    In an alternate universe...(1/X) https://twitter.com/...