/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Chainalysis releases initial estimates showing that ~$10B worth of crypto transfers in 2020 were related to criminal activity, compared to ~$21.4B in 2019

Chainalysis Blog :

Chainalysis Blog

Context & Ripple Effects

This early Chainalysis estimate established a baseline for measuring criminally related crypto activity. Later coverage shows that the firm reported different, narrower measures for 2020—$6.6B in laundering activity and $7.8B sent to criminal addresses—making metric definitions central to comparisons across reports.

The following year brought a reported increase in funds sent to criminal addresses, driven by DeFi scams, while later research tracked illicit activity through new asset types and longer-lived wallet exposure. The arc is less a single declining-or-rising series than an expanding map of how illicit crypto activity is measured.

First-order effects

  • Chainalysis gains an initial public reference point for 2020, allowing its later estimates of criminally related crypto activity to be compared against a stated prior-year level.
  • The reported decline versus 2019 puts attention on the scope of the metric—transfers related to criminal activity—rather than treating all illicit-crypto measures as interchangeable.

Second-order effects

  • Later Chainalysis reports separate funds sent to criminal addresses from laundering flows, so analysts comparing annual figures must distinguish the underlying activity being counted rather than infer a single trend from the totals.
  • The subsequent rise in 2021 funds sent to criminal addresses tied to DeFi scams shifts the focus from a year-over-year aggregate toward the platforms and activity types generating illicit flows.

Third-order effects

  • Chainalysis's later finding that illicit actors shifted from bitcoin toward stablecoins in 2024 points to monitoring that must follow changing asset usage, not just total transaction values.
  • The move from transaction-flow estimates to wallet balances with downstream illicit exposure broadens crypto-risk measurement from discrete transfers to the assets and counterparties connected to them.

The trend: Crypto compliance analytics is evolving from annual estimates of illicit transfers toward differentiated tracking of activity type, asset mix, and wallet exposure.

Discussion

  • @cointracker @cointracker on x
    0.34% of cryptocurrency is used for illicit activity according to @chainalysis. Compared to one-third of USD transactions. https://blog.chainalysis.com/ ...
  • @ianandrewsdc Ian Andrews on x
    Did you know that in 2020 only 0.34% of all cryptocurrency transactions were related to criminal activity? I'd have guessed 30x that number if you'd asked me last week. Read more here: https://blog.chainalysis.com/ ...
  • @chrismessina Chris Messina on x
    Related: @chainalysis reports that $10B of crypto were used for criminal purposes in 2020 (down around 50% from 2019), but I'm curious how much was spent on similar criminal activity on social media platforms? https://blog.chainalysis.com/ ...