/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

In a letter to Sen. Wyden, ODNI says FBI used Section 215 of the Patriot Act to collect website visitor logs without a warrant, but not keywords from searches

before being caught by DOJ. https://twitter.com/... Jameel Jaffer / @jameeljaffer : It's been obvious from the outset that Section 215 would be used in precisely this way. Congress should have narrowed the law many years ago. https://twitter.com/... Alex Howard / @digiphile : Remember when privacy advocates & civil libertarians warned the US government was obtaining the Internet browsing & search histories of Americans without a warrant? And Congress voted to allow it? https://gizmodo.com/... Well, here you go: https://twitter.com/... Sara Morrison / @saramorrison : in case you were wondering why @RonWyden and @SteveDaines were fighting so hard for that Patriot Act provision forbidding warrantless collection of browsing history and searches: https://www.nytimes.com/...

New York Times Charlie Savage

Discussion

  • @charlie_savage Charlie Savage on x
    New/exclusive: The government has used Section 215 of the Patriot Act to collect logs of visitors to a website, according to an ODNI letter to @RonWyden. /1 https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @zackwhittaker Zack Whittaker on x
    “The government has interpreted a high-profile provision of the Patriot Act as empowering F.B.I. national-security investigators to collect logs showing who has visited particular web pages, documents show.” Always suspected but now proven. Wow. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @jameeljaffer Jameel Jaffer on x
    It's been obvious from the outset that Section 215 would be used in precisely this way. Congress should have narrowed the law many years ago. https://twitter.com/...
  • @jakelaperruque @jakelaperruque on x
    Important point in @charlie_savage latest on the PATRIOT Act - if expired provisions of the law end up being debated before Congress next year, the fact that you have these “bulk-ish” demands really highlights the importance of the Wyden-Daines amendment https://twitter.com/...
  • @snowden Edward Snowden on x
    Big: The FBI secretly abused the same authority that caused a mass surveillance scandal under Obama in a new way to monitor connections to an unidentified US website. When Congress asked about it, the Director of National Intelligence initially lied—before being caught by DOJ. ht…
  • @bradmossesq Bradley P. Moss on x
    Oh hello, old friend https://twitter.com/...
  • @pt Parker on x
    But wearing a mask is too much government. https://twitter.com/...
  • @digiphile Alex Howard on x
    Remember when privacy advocates & civil libertarians warned the US government was obtaining the Internet browsing & search histories of Americans without a warrant? And Congress voted to allow it? https://gizmodo.com/... Well, here you go: https://twitter.com/...
  • @saramorrison Sara Morrison on x
    in case you were wondering why @RonWyden and @SteveDaines were fighting so hard for that Patriot Act provision forbidding warrantless collection of browsing history and searches: https://www.nytimes.com/...