/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

IT security company Ivanti has acquired enterprise mobile security firm MobileIron for $872M in stock and corporate VPN provider Pulse Secure for an unknown sum

Zack Whittaker / TechCrunch :

TechCrunch Zack Whittaker

Context & Ripple Effects

Ivanti's double acquisition lands mid-way through a multi-year consolidation run in enterprise security: Imperva paid $140M for DevOps-security firm Prevoty in 2018, Sophos added ML-driven endpoint protection via Invincea for $100M plus an earn-out in 2017, and Avira exited to private equity at a $180M valuation in April 2020. Each deal was a single-capability bolt-on; Ivanti is instead buying two whole product lines at once.

The pairing is deliberate: MobileIron brings unified endpoint management, Pulse Secure brings the corporate VPN, so Ivanti can sell device control and network access as one stack. The move also sets up a direct rivalry with Jamf, which answered five months later with its own $400M Wandera acquisition to push into cloud-based zero trust security.

First-order effects

  • MobileIron and Pulse Secure customers now face a single vendor for endpoint management and remote access, with Ivanti able to bundle both into existing IT service-management contracts.

Second-order effects

  • Standalone UEM and VPN vendors lose pricing leverage against bundled suites, and Jamf's response — acquiring Wandera to bridge consumer and enterprise zero-trust needs — shows competitors treating Ivanti's combined stack as a direct threat.
  • Security buyers get fewer independent alternatives per category, shifting negotiation power toward platform vendors and pressuring point-solution pricing across endpoint and access markets.

Third-order effects

  • Consolidating VPN appliances under one vendor concentrates risk: Ivanti itself later warned that threat actors exploited a critical zero-day in its Connect Secure VPN appliance, compromising corporate customer networks — a reminder that merged perimeters create single points of failure.
  • If the pattern holds, the standalone VPN category keeps shrinking toward zero-trust architectures, with device-management platforms absorbing network-access functions and regulators and insurers eventually scrutinizing concentrated vendor dependencies.

The trend: Enterprise security is consolidating from point products into bundled platform stacks spanning endpoint management and network access, even as zero trust steadily erodes the VPN those bundles are built around.

Discussion

  • @bad_packets Bad Packets on x
    CVE-2019-11510 and CVE-2020-15505 for those keeping score at home. https://twitter.com/...
  • @pulsesecure @pulsesecure on x
    We are excited to announce that as of today, we are now part of @GoIvanti! Together, we will deliver intelligent and secure experiences across all devices in the everywhere enterprise - learn more about our combined solution: https://www.ivanti.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @campuscodi Catalin Cimpanu on x
    [Scene] Ivanti board meeting Ivanti CEO: What are among the most attacked enterprise devices today! CISO: MobileIron, Pulse Secure CEO: Buy them! Right now! https://www.ivanti.com/... https://twitter.com/...